
Advance-RumelyModel A
Advance-Rumely DoAll
Utility
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 173 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 2
Head to head · Utility

Utility
Crawler
How they compare
DoAll is in the 46th percentile; D7 is in the 97th · 5,580 models
DoAll is in the 50th percentile; D7 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
DoAll is in the 1st percentile; D7 is in the 6th · 4,941 models
DoAll is in the 32nd percentile; D7 is in the 96th · 5,107 models
Full comparison
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Caterpillar D7 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Advance-Rumely | Caterpillar | — |
| Model | DoAll | D7 | — |
| Category | Utility | Crawler | — |
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Caterpillar D7 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Waukesha | Caterpillar | — |
| Rated RPM | 1,400RPM | 1,050RPM | ▲ DoAll+350 RPM · +33% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 173ci | 831ci | ▲ D7+658 ci · +380% |
| Bore | 3.5in | 5.8in | ▲ D7+2.3 in · +66% |
| Stroke | 4.5in | 8in | ▲ D7+3.5 in · +78% |
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Caterpillar D7 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear | Gear | Same |
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Caterpillar D7 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 110in | 162in | ▲ D7+52 in · +47% |
| Width | 82in | 97in | ▲ D7+15 in · +18% |
| Height | 64in | 80in | ▲ D7+16 in · +25% |
| Operating Weight | 3,702lb | 24,330lb | ▲ D7+20,628 lb · +557% |
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Caterpillar D7 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Manual | Manual Clutches | — |
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Caterpillar D7 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Manual | Manual Clutches | — |
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Caterpillar D7 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Not recorded | 2-cylinder Pony Engine | — |
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Caterpillar D7 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 5.5gal | 18gal | ▲ D7+12.5 gal · +227% |
Category context