Advance-RumelyModel A
Advance-Rumely DoAll
Utility
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 173 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 2
Head to head · Utility
Advance-Rumely DoAll vs Caterpillar Sixty-Five
Image not recorded
CaterpillarModel B
Caterpillar Sixty-Five
Crawler
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 1,309 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 3
Advance-RumelyAdvance-Rumely DoAll
vs
CaterpillarCaterpillar Sixty-Five
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Displacement
▲ Sixty-Five higher · +1,136 ci (+657%)DoAll173 ci
Sixty-Five1,309 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
DoAll is in the 46th percentile; Sixty-Five is in the 99th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedDoAll4
Sixty-Five4
Median Utility Tractor4
DoAll is in the 50th percentile; Sixty-Five is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ Sixty-Five higher · +1 (+50%)DoAll2
Sixty-Five3
Median Utility Tractor12
DoAll is in the 1st percentile; Sixty-Five is in the 3rd · 4,941 models
Operating Weight
▲ Sixty-Five higher · +21,263 lb (+574%)DoAll3,702 lb
Sixty-Five24,965 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
DoAll is in the 32nd percentile; Sixty-Five is in the 96th · 5,107 models
DoAll (A)Sixty-Five (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Caterpillar Sixty-Five | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Advance-Rumely | Caterpillar | — |
| Model | DoAll | Sixty-Five | — |
| Category | Utility | Crawler | — |
Engine
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Caterpillar Sixty-Five | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Waukesha | Caterpillar | — |
| Rated RPM | 1,400RPM | 650RPM | ▲ DoAll+750 RPM · +115% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 173ci | 1,309ci | ▲ Sixty-Five+1,136 ci · +657% |
| Bore | 3.5in | 7in | ▲ Sixty-Five+3.5 in · +100% |
| Stroke | 4.5in | 8.5in | ▲ Sixty-Five+4 in · +89% |
Transmission
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Caterpillar Sixty-Five | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear | Gear | Same |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Caterpillar Sixty-Five | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 110in | Not recorded | — |
| Width | 82in | 20in | ▲ DoAll+62 in · +310% |
| Height | 64in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 3,702lb | 24,965lb | ▲ Sixty-Five+21,263 lb · +574% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Caterpillar Sixty-Five | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Manual | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Caterpillar Sixty-Five | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Manual | Not recorded | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Caterpillar Sixty-Five | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 5.5gal | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 46th percentile (173 ci)B · 99th percentile (1,309 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 1st percentile (2)B · 3rd percentile (3)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 32nd percentile (3,702 lb)B · 96th percentile (24,965 lb)
Width
median 66 inA · 84th percentile (82 in)B · 1st percentile (20 in)
A · DoAllB · Sixty-FiveMedian Utility Tractor