Advance-RumelyModel A
Advance-Rumely DoAll
Utility
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 173 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 2
Head to head · Utility
Advance-Rumely DoAll vs Challenger MT445
ChallengerModel B
Challenger MT445
Utility
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 258 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 24
Advance-RumelyAdvance-Rumely DoAll
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT445
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Displacement
▲ MT445 higher · +85 ci (+49%)DoAll173 ci
MT445258 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
DoAll is in the 46th percentile; MT445 is in the 73rd · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedDoAll4
MT4454
Median Utility Tractor4
DoAll is in the 50th percentile; MT445 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ MT445 higher · +22 (+1100%)DoAll2
MT44524
Median Utility Tractor12
DoAll is in the 1st percentile; MT445 is in the 92nd · 4,941 models
Operating Weight
▲ MT445 higher · +2,509 lb (+68%)DoAll3,702 lb
MT4456,211 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
DoAll is in the 32nd percentile; MT445 is in the 59th · 5,107 models
DoAll (A)MT445 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Challenger MT445 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Advance-Rumely | Challenger | — |
| Model | DoAll | MT445 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Challenger MT445 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Waukesha | Perkins | — |
| Model | Not recorded | 3054B | — |
| Rated RPM | 1,400RPM | 2,200RPM | ▲ MT445+800 RPM · +57% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 173ci | 258ci | ▲ MT445+85 ci · +49% |
| Bore | 3.5in | 4.1in | ▲ MT445+0.6 in · +17% |
| Stroke | 4.5in | 5in | ▲ MT445+0.5 in · +11% |
Transmission
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Challenger MT445 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear | Power Shuttle | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Challenger MT445 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 110in | 163in | ▲ MT445+53 in · +48% |
| Width | 82in | 77in | ▲ DoAll+5 in · +6% |
| Height | 64in | 103in | ▲ MT445+39 in · +61% |
| Operating Weight | 3,702lb | 6,211lb | ▲ MT445+2,509 lb · +68% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Challenger MT445 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Open Center | — |
| Steering Type | Manual | Not recorded | — |
Tread Width
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Challenger MT445 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tread Width | Not recorded | 12.4in | — |
| Rear Tread | Not recorded | 13.6in | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Challenger MT445 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | Category 2 | — |
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | Category 2 | — |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Challenger MT445 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x2 | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 2WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Manual | Not recorded | — |
| Brake Type | Not recorded | Wet Disc | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Challenger MT445 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Not recorded | Electric Starter | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Challenger MT445 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 5.5gal | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Challenger MT445 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Open (ROPS) | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 46th percentile (173 ci)B · 73rd percentile (258 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 1st percentile (2)B · 92nd percentile (24)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 32nd percentile (3,702 lb)B · 59th percentile (6,211 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 16th percentile (110 in)B · 81st percentile (163 in)
A · DoAllB · MT445Median Utility Tractor