Advance-RumelyModel A
Advance-Rumely DoAll
Utility
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 173 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 2
Head to head · Utility
Advance-Rumely DoAll vs Challenger MT665
Image not recorded
ChallengerModel B
Challenger MT665
Row Crop
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 513 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 18
Advance-RumelyAdvance-Rumely DoAll
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT665
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Displacement
▲ MT665 higher · +340 ci (+197%)DoAll173 ci
MT665513 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
DoAll is in the 46th percentile; MT665 is in the 94th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ MT665 higher · +2 (+50%)DoAll4
MT6656
Median Utility Tractor4
DoAll is in the 50th percentile; MT665 is in the 93rd · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ MT665 higher · +16 (+800%)DoAll2
MT66518
Median Utility Tractor12
DoAll is in the 1st percentile; MT665 is in the 83rd · 4,941 models
Operating Weight
▲ MT665 higher · +17,798 lb (+481%)DoAll3,702 lb
MT66521,500 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
DoAll is in the 32nd percentile; MT665 is in the 95th · 5,107 models
DoAll (A)MT665 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Challenger MT665 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Advance-Rumely | Challenger | — |
| Model | DoAll | MT665 | — |
| Category | Utility | Row Crop | — |
Engine
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Challenger MT665 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Waukesha | Sisu | — |
| Rated RPM | 1,400RPM | 2,200RPM | ▲ MT665+800 RPM · +57% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 6 | ▲ MT665+2 · +50% |
| Displacement | 173ci | 513ci | ▲ MT665+340 ci · +197% |
| Bore | 3.5in | 4.4in | ▲ MT665+0.9 in · +26% |
| Stroke | 4.5in | 5.7in | ▲ MT665+1.2 in · +27% |
Transmission
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Challenger MT665 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear | 18-speed power shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Challenger MT665 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 110in | 203in | ▲ MT665+93 in · +85% |
| Width | 82in | 98.2in | ▲ MT665+16.2 in · +20% |
| Height | 64in | 121in | ▲ MT665+57 in · +89% |
| Wheelbase | Not recorded | 121in | — |
| Operating Weight | 3,702lb | 21,500lb | ▲ MT665+17,798 lb · +481% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Challenger MT665 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Closed center pressure flow compensated (PFC) | — |
| Steering Type | Manual | Power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Challenger MT665 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | Three-Point Hitch | — |
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | III | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Challenger MT665 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Manual | Power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Challenger MT665 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Not recorded | Electric | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Challenger MT665 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 5.5gal | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Challenger MT665 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Cab | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 46th percentile (173 ci)B · 94th percentile (513 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 93rd percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 1st percentile (2)B · 83rd percentile (18)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 32nd percentile (3,702 lb)B · 95th percentile (21,500 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 16th percentile (110 in)B · 94th percentile (203 in)
A · DoAllB · MT665Median Utility Tractor