
Advance-RumelyModel A
Advance-Rumely DoAll
Utility
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 173 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 2
Head to head · Utility

Utility

Crawler
How they compare
DoAll is in the 46th percentile; 80D is in the 96th · 5,580 models
DoAll is in the 50th percentile; 80D is in the 93rd · 5,720 models
DoAll is in the 1st percentile; 80D is in the 3rd · 4,941 models
DoAll is in the 32nd percentile; 80D is in the 96th · 5,107 models
Full comparison
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Cletrac 80D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Advance-Rumely | Cletrac | — |
| Model | DoAll | 80D | — |
| Category | Utility | Crawler | — |
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Cletrac 80D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Waukesha | Hercules | — |
| Model | Not recorded | DHX | — |
| Rated RPM | 1,400RPM | 1,300RPM | ▲ DoAll+100 RPM · +8% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 6 | ▲ 80D+2 · +50% |
| Displacement | 173ci | 707ci | ▲ 80D+534 ci · +309% |
| Bore | 3.5in | 5in | ▲ 80D+1.5 in · +43% |
| Stroke | 4.5in | 6in | ▲ 80D+1.5 in · +33% |
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Cletrac 80D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear | Gear | Same |
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Cletrac 80D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 110in | 173in | ▲ 80D+63 in · +57% |
| Width | 82in | 94.5in | ▲ 80D+12.5 in · +15% |
| Height | 64in | 83.8in | ▲ 80D+19.8 in · +31% |
| Operating Weight | 3,702lb | 24,000lb | ▲ 80D+20,298 lb · +548% |
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Cletrac 80D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Manual | Not recorded | — |
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Cletrac 80D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Manual | Not recorded | — |
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Cletrac 80D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Not recorded | Electric | — |
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Cletrac 80D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 5.5gal | Not recorded | — |
Category context