Advance-RumelyModel A
Advance-Rumely DoAll
Utility
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 173 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 2
Head to head · Utility
Advance-Rumely DoAll vs Cockshutt 1950-T
Image not recorded
CockshuttModel B
Cockshutt 1950-T
Row Crop
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 310 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 18
Advance-RumelyAdvance-Rumely DoAll
vs
CockshuttCockshutt 1950-T
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Displacement
▲ 1950-T higher · +137 ci (+79%)DoAll173 ci
1950-T310 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
DoAll is in the 46th percentile; 1950-T is in the 85th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ 1950-T higher · +2 (+50%)DoAll4
1950-T6
Median Utility Tractor4
DoAll is in the 50th percentile; 1950-T is in the 93rd · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ 1950-T higher · +16 (+800%)DoAll2
1950-T18
Median Utility Tractor12
DoAll is in the 1st percentile; 1950-T is in the 83rd · 4,941 models
Operating Weight
▲ 1950-T higher · +6,758 lb (+183%)DoAll3,702 lb
1950-T10,460 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
DoAll is in the 32nd percentile; 1950-T is in the 87th · 5,107 models
DoAll (A)1950-T (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Cockshutt 1950-T | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Advance-Rumely | Cockshutt | — |
| Model | DoAll | 1950-T | — |
| Category | Utility | Row Crop | — |
Engine
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Cockshutt 1950-T | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Waukesha | Waukesha-Oliver | — |
| Rated RPM | 1,400RPM | 2,400RPM | ▲ 1950-T+1,000 RPM · +71% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 6 | ▲ 1950-T+2 · +50% |
| Displacement | 173ci | 310ci | ▲ 1950-T+137 ci · +79% |
| Bore | 3.5in | 3.9in | ▲ 1950-T+0.4 in · +11% |
| Stroke | 4.5in | 4.4in | ▲ DoAll+0.1 in · +2% |
Transmission
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Cockshutt 1950-T | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear | Partial Power Shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Cockshutt 1950-T | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 110in | Not recorded | — |
| Width | 82in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 64in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 3,702lb | 10,460lb | ▲ 1950-T+6,758 lb · +183% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Cockshutt 1950-T | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Manual | Hydraulic Power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Cockshutt 1950-T | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | III | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Cockshutt 1950-T | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x2 2WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 2WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Manual | Hydraulic Power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Cockshutt 1950-T | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Not recorded | Electric | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Cockshutt 1950-T | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 5.5gal | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 46th percentile (173 ci)B · 85th percentile (310 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 93rd percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 1st percentile (2)B · 83rd percentile (18)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 32nd percentile (3,702 lb)B · 87th percentile (10,460 lb)
A · DoAllB · 1950-TMedian Utility Tractor