Advance-RumelyModel A
Advance-Rumely DoAll
Utility
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 173 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 2
Head to head · Utility
Advance-Rumely DoAll vs Cockshutt 660
CockshuttModel B
Cockshutt 660
Row Crop
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 155 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 6
Advance-RumelyAdvance-Rumely DoAll
vs
CockshuttCockshutt 660
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Displacement
▲ DoAll higher · +18 ci (+12%)DoAll173 ci
660155 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
DoAll is in the 46th percentile; 660 is in the 42nd · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedDoAll4
6604
Median Utility Tractor4
DoAll is in the 50th percentile; 660 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ 660 higher · +4 (+200%)DoAll2
6606
Median Utility Tractor12
DoAll is in the 1st percentile; 660 is in the 11th · 4,941 models
Operating Weight
▲ 660 higher · +348 lb (+9%)DoAll3,702 lb
6604,050 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
DoAll is in the 32nd percentile; 660 is in the 37th · 5,107 models
DoAll (A)660 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Cockshutt 660 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Advance-Rumely | Cockshutt | — |
| Model | DoAll | 660 | — |
| Category | Utility | Row Crop | — |
Engine
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Cockshutt 660 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Waukesha | Waukesha-Oliver | — |
| Model | Not recorded | 2.5L 4-cyl | — |
| Rated RPM | 1,400RPM | Not recorded | — |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 173ci | 155ci | ▲ DoAll+18 ci · +12% |
| Bore | 3.5in | 3.6in | ▲ 660+0.1 in · +3% |
| Stroke | 4.5in | 3.8in | ▲ DoAll+0.7 in · +18% |
Transmission
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Cockshutt 660 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear | Unsynchronized Gear | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Cockshutt 660 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 110in | Not recorded | — |
| Width | 82in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 64in | Not recorded | — |
| Wheelbase | Not recorded | 92in | — |
| Operating Weight | 3,702lb | 4,050lb | ▲ 660+348 lb · +9% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Cockshutt 660 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Manual | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Cockshutt 660 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x2 2WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 2WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Manual | Not recorded | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Cockshutt 660 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 5.5gal | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 46th percentile (173 ci)B · 42nd percentile (155 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 1st percentile (2)B · 11th percentile (6)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 32nd percentile (3,702 lb)B · 37th percentile (4,050 lb)
A · DoAllB · 660Median Utility Tractor