Advance-RumelyModel A
Advance-Rumely DoAll
Utility
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 173 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 2
Head to head · Utility
Advance-Rumely DoAll vs Cockshutt 70
CockshuttModel B
Cockshutt 70
Row Crop
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 201 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 6
Advance-RumelyAdvance-Rumely DoAll
vs
CockshuttCockshutt 70
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Displacement
▲ 70 higher · +28 ci (+16%)DoAll173 ci
70201 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
DoAll is in the 46th percentile; 70 is in the 54th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ 70 higher · +2 (+50%)DoAll4
706
Median Utility Tractor4
DoAll is in the 50th percentile; 70 is in the 93rd · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ 70 higher · +4 (+200%)DoAll2
706
Median Utility Tractor12
DoAll is in the 1st percentile; 70 is in the 11th · 4,941 models
Operating Weight
▲ 70 higher · +698 lb (+19%)DoAll3,702 lb
704,400 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
DoAll is in the 32nd percentile; 70 is in the 42nd · 5,107 models
DoAll (A)70 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Cockshutt 70 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Advance-Rumely | Cockshutt | — |
| Model | DoAll | 70 | — |
| Category | Utility | Row Crop | — |
Engine
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Cockshutt 70 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Waukesha | Oliver | — |
| Model | Not recorded | 3.3L 6-cyl | — |
| Rated RPM | 1,400RPM | 1,500RPM | ▲ 70+100 RPM · +7% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 6 | ▲ 70+2 · +50% |
| Displacement | 173ci | 201ci | ▲ 70+28 ci · +16% |
| Bore | 3.5in | 3.1in | ▲ DoAll+0.4 in · +13% |
| Stroke | 4.5in | 4.4in | ▲ DoAll+0.1 in · +2% |
Transmission
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Cockshutt 70 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear | Manual | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Cockshutt 70 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 110in | Not recorded | — |
| Width | 82in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 64in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 3,702lb | 4,400lb | ▲ 70+698 lb · +19% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Cockshutt 70 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Manual | Manual | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Cockshutt 70 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x2 2WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 2WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Manual | Manual | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Cockshutt 70 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 5.5gal | 1.1gal | ▲ DoAll+4.4 gal · +400% |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 46th percentile (173 ci)B · 54th percentile (201 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 93rd percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 1st percentile (2)B · 11th percentile (6)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 32nd percentile (3,702 lb)B · 42nd percentile (4,400 lb)
A · DoAllB · 70Median Utility Tractor