Advance-RumelyModel A
Advance-Rumely DoAll
Utility
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 173 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 2
Head to head · Utility
Advance-Rumely DoAll vs Ford-New Holland 4230
Ford-New HollandModel B
Ford-New Holland 4230
Agricultural
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 220 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 12
Advance-RumelyAdvance-Rumely DoAll
vs
Ford-New HollandFord-New Holland 4230
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Displacement
▲ 4230 higher · +47 ci (+27%)DoAll173 ci
4230220 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
DoAll is in the 46th percentile; 4230 is in the 60th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedDoAll4
42304
Median Utility Tractor4
DoAll is in the 50th percentile; 4230 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ 4230 higher · +10 (+500%)DoAll2
423012
Median Utility Tractor12
DoAll is in the 1st percentile; 4230 is in the 50th · 4,941 models
Operating Weight
▲ 4230 higher · +1,198 lb (+32%)DoAll3,702 lb
42304,900 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
DoAll is in the 32nd percentile; 4230 is in the 47th · 5,107 models
DoAll (A)4230 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Ford-New Holland 4230 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Advance-Rumely | Ford-New Holland | — |
| Model | DoAll | 4230 | — |
| Category | Utility | Agricultural | — |
Engine
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Ford-New Holland 4230 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Waukesha | Fiat | — |
| Rated RPM | 1,400RPM | Not recorded | — |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 173ci | 220ci | ▲ 4230+47 ci · +27% |
| Bore | 3.5in | Not recorded | — |
| Stroke | 4.5in | Not recorded | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Ford-New Holland 4230 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear | Shuttle | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Ford-New Holland 4230 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 110in | Not recorded | — |
| Width | 82in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 64in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 3,702lb | 4,900lb | ▲ 4230+1,198 lb · +32% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Ford-New Holland 4230 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Manual | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Ford-New Holland 4230 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | II | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Ford-New Holland 4230 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x2 2WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 2WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Manual | Not recorded | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Ford-New Holland 4230 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 5.5gal | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 46th percentile (173 ci)B · 60th percentile (220 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 1st percentile (2)B · 50th percentile (12)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 32nd percentile (3,702 lb)B · 47th percentile (4,900 lb)
A · DoAllB · 4230Median Utility Tractor