Advance-RumelyModel A
Advance-Rumely DoAll
Utility
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 173 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 2
Head to head · Utility
Advance-Rumely DoAll vs Leyland 702
LeylandModel B
Leyland 702
Standard Tread
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 230 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 9
Advance-RumelyAdvance-Rumely DoAll
vs
LeylandLeyland 702
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Displacement
▲ 702 higher · +57 ci (+33%)DoAll173 ci
702230 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
DoAll is in the 46th percentile; 702 is in the 62nd · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedDoAll4
7024
Median Utility Tractor4
DoAll is in the 50th percentile; 702 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ 702 higher · +7 (+350%)DoAll2
7029
Median Utility Tractor12
DoAll is in the 1st percentile; 702 is in the 35th · 4,941 models
Operating Weight
▲ 702 higher · +2,198 lb (+59%)DoAll3,702 lb
7025,900 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
DoAll is in the 32nd percentile; 702 is in the 55th · 5,107 models
DoAll (A)702 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Leyland 702 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Advance-Rumely | Leyland | — |
| Model | DoAll | 702 | — |
| Category | Utility | Standard Tread | — |
Engine
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Leyland 702 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Waukesha | Leyland | — |
| Rated RPM | 1,400RPM | Not recorded | — |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 173ci | 230ci | ▲ 702+57 ci · +33% |
| Bore | 3.5in | Not recorded | — |
| Stroke | 4.5in | Not recorded | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Leyland 702 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear | Not recorded | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Leyland 702 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 110in | Not recorded | — |
| Width | 82in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 64in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 3,702lb | 5,900lb | ▲ 702+2,198 lb · +59% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Leyland 702 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Manual | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Leyland 702 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | III | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Leyland 702 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x2 2WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 2WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Manual | Not recorded | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Leyland 702 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 5.5gal | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 46th percentile (173 ci)B · 62nd percentile (230 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 1st percentile (2)B · 35th percentile (9)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 32nd percentile (3,702 lb)B · 55th percentile (5,900 lb)
A · DoAllB · 702Median Utility Tractor