Advance-RumelyModel A
Advance-Rumely DoAll
Utility
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 173 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 2
Head to head · Utility
Advance-Rumely DoAll vs McCormick-Deering ODS-6
McCormick-DeeringModel B
McCormick-Deering ODS-6
Agricultural
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 248 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 5
Advance-RumelyAdvance-Rumely DoAll
vs
McCormick-DeeringMcCormick-Deering ODS-6
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Displacement
▲ ODS-6 higher · +75 ci (+43%)DoAll173 ci
ODS-6248 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
DoAll is in the 46th percentile; ODS-6 is in the 69th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedDoAll4
ODS-64
Median Utility Tractor4
DoAll is in the 50th percentile; ODS-6 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ ODS-6 higher · +3 (+150%)DoAll2
ODS-65
Median Utility Tractor12
DoAll is in the 1st percentile; ODS-6 is in the 6th · 4,941 models
Operating Weight
▲ ODS-6 higher · +1,683 lb (+45%)DoAll3,702 lb
ODS-65,385 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
DoAll is in the 32nd percentile; ODS-6 is in the 50th · 5,107 models
DoAll (A)ODS-6 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | McCormick-Deering ODS-6 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Advance-Rumely | McCormick-Deering | — |
| Model | DoAll | ODS-6 | — |
| Category | Utility | Agricultural, Orchard/Vineyard | — |
Engine
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | McCormick-Deering ODS-6 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Waukesha | International Harvester | — |
| Rated RPM | 1,400RPM | 1,450RPM | ▲ ODS-6+50 RPM · +4% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 173ci | 248ci | ▲ ODS-6+75 ci · +43% |
| Bore | 3.5in | 3.9in | ▲ ODS-6+0.4 in · +11% |
| Stroke | 4.5in | 5.3in | ▲ ODS-6+0.8 in · +18% |
Transmission
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | McCormick-Deering ODS-6 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear | gear | Same |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | McCormick-Deering ODS-6 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 110in | 133in | ▲ ODS-6+23 in · +21% |
| Width | 82in | 59.8in | ▲ DoAll+22.2 in · +37% |
| Height | 64in | 61.5in | ▲ DoAll+2.5 in · +4% |
| Operating Weight | 3,702lb | 5,385lb | ▲ ODS-6+1,683 lb · +45% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | McCormick-Deering ODS-6 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Manual | manual | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | McCormick-Deering ODS-6 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x2 2WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 2WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Manual | manual | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | McCormick-Deering ODS-6 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 5.5gal | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 46th percentile (173 ci)B · 69th percentile (248 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 1st percentile (2)B · 6th percentile (5)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 32nd percentile (3,702 lb)B · 50th percentile (5,385 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 16th percentile (110 in)B · 45th percentile (133 in)
A · DoAllB · ODS-6Median Utility Tractor