Advance-RumelyModel A
Advance-Rumely DoAll
Utility
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 173 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 2
Head to head · Utility
Advance-Rumely DoAll vs Minneapolis-Moline BF
Minneapolis-MolineModel B
Minneapolis-Moline BF
Utility
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 133 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 4
Advance-RumelyAdvance-Rumely DoAll
vs
Minneapolis-MolineMinneapolis-Moline BF
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Displacement
▲ DoAll higher · +40 ci (+30%)DoAll173 ci
BF133 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
DoAll is in the 46th percentile; BF is in the 31st · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ DoAll higher · +1 (+33%)DoAll4
BF3
Median Utility Tractor4
DoAll is in the 50th percentile; BF is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ BF higher · +2 (+100%)DoAll2
BF4
Median Utility Tractor12
DoAll is in the 1st percentile; BF is in the 4th · 4,941 models
Operating Weight
▲ DoAll higher · +66 lb (+2%)DoAll3,702 lb
BF3,636 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
DoAll is in the 32nd percentile; BF is in the 31st · 5,107 models
DoAll (A)BF (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Minneapolis-Moline BF | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Advance-Rumely | Minneapolis-Moline | — |
| Model | DoAll | BF | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Minneapolis-Moline BF | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Waukesha | Minneapolis-Moline | — |
| Model | Not recorded | 235.3.31 8 | — |
| Rated RPM | 1,400RPM | 1,800RPM | ▲ BF+400 RPM · +29% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 3 | ▲ DoAll+1 · +33% |
| Displacement | 173ci | 133ci | ▲ DoAll+40 ci · +30% |
| Bore | 3.5in | 3in | ▲ DoAll+0.5 in · +17% |
| Stroke | 4.5in | 3in | ▲ DoAll+1.5 in · +50% |
Transmission
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Minneapolis-Moline BF | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear | Unsynchronized Gear | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Minneapolis-Moline BF | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 110in | 117in | ▲ BF+7 in · +6% |
| Width | 82in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 64in | 76in | ▲ BF+12 in · +19% |
| Wheelbase | Not recorded | 79in | — |
| Operating Weight | 3,702lb | 3,636lb | ▲ DoAll+66 lb · +2% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Minneapolis-Moline BF | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Manual | Manual | Same |
Tires
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Minneapolis-Moline BF | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | Not recorded | 5.50-15 | — |
| Rear Tire Size | Not recorded | 28-Oct | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Minneapolis-Moline BF | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | Optional | — |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Minneapolis-Moline BF | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | Tricycle | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 2WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Manual | Manual | Same |
| Brake Type | Not recorded | External contracting bands operated by right foot on pedals either independently or interlocked | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Minneapolis-Moline BF | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Not recorded | Electric | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Minneapolis-Moline BF | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 5.5gal | 2.8gal | ▲ DoAll+2.7 gal · +96% |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 46th percentile (173 ci)B · 31st percentile (133 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 1st percentile (2)B · 4th percentile (4)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 32nd percentile (3,702 lb)B · 31st percentile (3,636 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 16th percentile (110 in)B · 23rd percentile (117 in)
A · DoAllB · BFMedian Utility Tractor