Advance-RumelyModel A
Advance-Rumely DoAll
Utility
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 173 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 2
Head to head · Utility
Advance-Rumely DoAll vs Minneapolis-Moline G900
Image not recorded
Minneapolis-MolineModel B
Minneapolis-Moline G900
Agricultural
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 426 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 10
Advance-RumelyAdvance-Rumely DoAll
vs
Minneapolis-MolineMinneapolis-Moline G900
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Displacement
▲ G900 higher · +253 ci (+146%)DoAll173 ci
G900426 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
DoAll is in the 46th percentile; G900 is in the 92nd · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ G900 higher · +2 (+50%)DoAll4
G9006
Median Utility Tractor4
DoAll is in the 50th percentile; G900 is in the 93rd · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ G900 higher · +8 (+400%)DoAll2
G90010
Median Utility Tractor12
DoAll is in the 1st percentile; G900 is in the 39th · 4,941 models
Operating Weight
▲ G900 higher · +6,598 lb (+178%)DoAll3,702 lb
G90010,300 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
DoAll is in the 32nd percentile; G900 is in the 86th · 5,107 models
DoAll (A)G900 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Minneapolis-Moline G900 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Advance-Rumely | Minneapolis-Moline | — |
| Model | DoAll | G900 | — |
| Category | Utility | Agricultural | — |
Engine
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Minneapolis-Moline G900 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Waukesha | Minneapolis-Moline | — |
| Rated RPM | 1,400RPM | 1,800RPM | ▲ G900+400 RPM · +29% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 6 | ▲ G900+2 · +50% |
| Displacement | 173ci | 426ci | ▲ G900+253 ci · +146% |
| Bore | 3.5in | 4.3in | ▲ G900+0.8 in · +23% |
| Stroke | 4.5in | 5in | ▲ G900+0.5 in · +11% |
Transmission
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Minneapolis-Moline G900 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear | partial power shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Minneapolis-Moline G900 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 110in | 165in | ▲ G900+55 in · +50% |
| Width | 82in | 94.1in | ▲ G900+12.1 in · +15% |
| Height | 64in | 84in | ▲ G900+20 in · +31% |
| Operating Weight | 3,702lb | 10,300lb | ▲ G900+6,598 lb · +178% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Minneapolis-Moline G900 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | open center | — |
| Steering Type | Manual | Not recorded | — |
Tread Width
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Minneapolis-Moline G900 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tread Width | Not recorded | 7.5in | — |
| Rear Tread | Not recorded | 23.1in | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Minneapolis-Moline G900 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | II | — |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Minneapolis-Moline G900 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Manual | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Minneapolis-Moline G900 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Not recorded | Electric | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Minneapolis-Moline G900 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 5.5gal | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Minneapolis-Moline G900 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Open | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 46th percentile (173 ci)B · 92nd percentile (426 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 93rd percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 1st percentile (2)B · 39th percentile (10)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 32nd percentile (3,702 lb)B · 86th percentile (10,300 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 16th percentile (110 in)B · 82nd percentile (165 in)
A · DoAllB · G900Median Utility Tractor