Advance-RumelyModel A
Advance-Rumely DoAll
Utility
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 173 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 2
Head to head · Utility
Advance-Rumely DoAll vs Twin City MT
Image not recorded
Twin CityModel B
Twin City MT
Standard Tread
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 284 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 3
Advance-RumelyAdvance-Rumely DoAll
vs
Twin CityTwin City MT
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Displacement
▲ MT higher · +111 ci (+64%)DoAll173 ci
MT284 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
DoAll is in the 46th percentile; MT is in the 83rd · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedDoAll4
MT4
Median Utility Tractor4
DoAll is in the 50th percentile; MT is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ MT higher · +1 (+50%)DoAll2
MT3
Median Utility Tractor12
DoAll is in the 1st percentile; MT is in the 3rd · 4,941 models
Operating Weight
▲ MT higher · +1,158 lb (+31%)DoAll3,702 lb
MT4,860 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
DoAll is in the 32nd percentile; MT is in the 46th · 5,107 models
DoAll (A)MT (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Twin City MT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Advance-Rumely | Twin City | — |
| Model | DoAll | MT | — |
| Category | Utility | Standard Tread | — |
Engine
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Twin City MT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Waukesha | Minneapolis | — |
| Rated RPM | 1,400RPM | 1,000RPM | ▲ DoAll+400 RPM · +40% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 173ci | 284ci | ▲ MT+111 ci · +64% |
| Bore | 3.5in | 4.3in | ▲ MT+0.8 in · +23% |
| Stroke | 4.5in | 5in | ▲ MT+0.5 in · +11% |
Transmission
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Twin City MT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear | Gear | Same |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Twin City MT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 110in | 143in | ▲ MT+33 in · +30% |
| Width | 82in | 93in | ▲ MT+11 in · +13% |
| Height | 64in | 64.5in | ▲ MT+0.5 in · <1% |
| Operating Weight | 3,702lb | 4,860lb | ▲ MT+1,158 lb · +31% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Twin City MT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Manual | Manual | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Twin City MT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Manual | Manual | Same |
Electrical
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Twin City MT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Not recorded | Hand-crank | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Twin City MT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 5.5gal | 6gal | ▲ MT+0.5 gal · +9% |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 46th percentile (173 ci)B · 83rd percentile (284 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 1st percentile (2)B · 3rd percentile (3)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 32nd percentile (3,702 lb)B · 46th percentile (4,860 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 16th percentile (110 in)B · 59th percentile (143 in)
A · DoAllB · MTMedian Utility Tractor