Advance-RumelyModel A
Advance-Rumely DoAll
Utility
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 173 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 2
Head to head · Utility
Advance-Rumely DoAll vs Zetor Hortus 65
Image not recorded
ZetorModel B
Zetor Hortus 65
Utility
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 179 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 24
Advance-RumelyAdvance-Rumely DoAll
vs
ZetorZetor Hortus 65
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Displacement
▲ Hortus 65 higher · +6 ci (+3%)DoAll173 ci
Hortus 65179 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
DoAll is in the 46th percentile; Hortus 65 is in the 47th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedDoAll4
Hortus 654
Median Utility Tractor4
DoAll is in the 50th percentile; Hortus 65 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ Hortus 65 higher · +22 (+1100%)DoAll2
Hortus 6524
Median Utility Tractor12
DoAll is in the 1st percentile; Hortus 65 is in the 92nd · 4,941 models
Operating Weight
▲ Hortus 65 higher · +1,920 lb (+52%)DoAll3,702 lb
Hortus 655,622 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
DoAll is in the 32nd percentile; Hortus 65 is in the 53rd · 5,107 models
DoAll (A)Hortus 65 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Zetor Hortus 65 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Advance-Rumely | Zetor | — |
| Model | DoAll | Hortus 65 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Zetor Hortus 65 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Waukesha | Deutz | — |
| Model | Not recorded | TCD 2.9 L4 | — |
| Rated RPM | 1,400RPM | Not recorded | — |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 173ci | 179ci | ▲ Hortus 65+6 ci · +3% |
| Bore | 3.5in | 3.6in | ▲ Hortus 65+0.1 in · +3% |
| Stroke | 4.5in | 4.3in | ▲ DoAll+0.2 in · +5% |
Transmission
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Zetor Hortus 65 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear | Mechanical shuttle | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Zetor Hortus 65 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 110in | 157in | ▲ Hortus 65+47 in · +43% |
| Width | 82in | 73.6in | ▲ DoAll+8.4 in · +11% |
| Height | 64in | 101in | ▲ Hortus 65+37 in · +58% |
| Operating Weight | 3,702lb | 5,622lb | ▲ Hortus 65+1,920 lb · +52% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Zetor Hortus 65 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Open center | — |
| Steering Type | Manual | Power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Zetor Hortus 65 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | Category II | — |
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | Category 3 | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Zetor Hortus 65 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Manual | Power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Zetor Hortus 65 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Not recorded | Electric | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Zetor Hortus 65 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 5.5gal | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Zetor Hortus 65 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Cab | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 46th percentile (173 ci)B · 47th percentile (179 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 1st percentile (2)B · 92nd percentile (24)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 32nd percentile (3,702 lb)B · 53rd percentile (5,622 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 16th percentile (110 in)B · 73rd percentile (157 in)
A · DoAllB · Hortus 65Median Utility Tractor