Image not recorded
Advance-RumelyModel A
Advance-Rumely OilPull B 25/45
Agricultural
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 1,884 ci
- Cylinders
- 2
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Agricultural
Advance-Rumely OilPull B 25/45 vs Cockshutt 1950-T
Image not recorded
CockshuttModel B
Cockshutt 1950-T
Row Crop
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 310 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 18
Advance-RumelyAdvance-Rumely OilPull B 25/45
vs
CockshuttCockshutt 1950-T
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Agricultural
Engine Displacement
▲ OilPull B 25/45 higher · +1,574 ci (+508%)OilPull B 25/451,884 ci
1950-T310 ci
Median Agricultural Tractor336 ci
OilPull B 25/45 is in the 99th percentile; 1950-T is in the 48th · 1,083 models
Cylinders
▲ 1950-T higher · +4 (+200%)OilPull B 25/452
1950-T6
Median Agricultural Tractor5.5
OilPull B 25/45 is in the 3rd percentile; 1950-T is in the 74th · 1,130 models
Operating Weight
▲ OilPull B 25/45 higher · +14,540 lb (+139%)OilPull B 25/4525,000 lb
1950-T10,460 lb
Median Agricultural Tractor10,914 lb
OilPull B 25/45 is in the 92nd percentile; 1950-T is in the 48th · 971 models
OilPull B 25/45 (A)1950-T (B)Median Agricultural Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Advance-Rumely OilPull B 25/45 | Cockshutt 1950-T | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Advance-Rumely | Cockshutt | — |
| Model | OilPull B 25/45 | 1950-T | — |
| Category | Agricultural | Row Crop | — |
Engine
| Spec | Advance-Rumely OilPull B 25/45 | Cockshutt 1950-T | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Rumley | Waukesha-Oliver | — |
| Rated RPM | Not recorded | 2,400RPM | — |
| Cylinders | 2 | 6 | ▲ 1950-T+4 · +200% |
| Displacement | 1,884ci | 310ci | ▲ OilPull B 25/45+1,574 ci · +508% |
| Bore | 9.5in | 3.9in | ▲ OilPull B 25/45+5.6 in · +144% |
| Stroke | 12in | 4.4in | ▲ OilPull B 25/45+7.6 in · +173% |
Transmission
| Spec | Advance-Rumely OilPull B 25/45 | Cockshutt 1950-T | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Partial Power Shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Advance-Rumely OilPull B 25/45 | Cockshutt 1950-T | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operating Weight | 25,000lb | 10,460lb | ▲ OilPull B 25/45+14,540 lb · +139% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Advance-Rumely OilPull B 25/45 | Cockshutt 1950-T | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Hydraulic Power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Advance-Rumely OilPull B 25/45 | Cockshutt 1950-T | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | III | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Advance-Rumely OilPull B 25/45 | Cockshutt 1950-T | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Hydraulic Power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Advance-Rumely OilPull B 25/45 | Cockshutt 1950-T | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Not recorded | Electric | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Displacement
median 336 ciA · 99th percentile (1,884 ci)B · 48th percentile (310 ci)
Cylinders
median 5.5A · 3rd percentile (2)B · 74th percentile (6)
Operating Weight
median 10,914 lbA · 92nd percentile (25,000 lb)B · 48th percentile (10,460 lb)
A · OilPull B 25/45B · 1950-TMedian Agricultural Tractor