Image not recorded
Advance-RumelyModel A
Advance-Rumely OilPull E 30/60
Agricultural
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 1,885 ci
- Cylinders
- 2
- Forward gears
- 1
Head to head · Agricultural
Advance-Rumely OilPull E 30/60 vs Challenger MT425
ChallengerModel B
Challenger MT425
Utility
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 243 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 24
Advance-RumelyAdvance-Rumely OilPull E 30/60
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT425
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Agricultural
Engine Displacement
▲ OilPull E 30/60 higher · +1,642 ci (+676%)OilPull E 30/601,885 ci
MT425243 ci
Median Agricultural Tractor336 ci
OilPull E 30/60 is in the 99th percentile; MT425 is in the 25th · 1,083 models
Cylinders
▲ MT425 higher · +2 (+100%)OilPull E 30/602
MT4254
Median Agricultural Tractor5.5
OilPull E 30/60 is in the 3rd percentile; MT425 is in the 31st · 1,130 models
Forward Gears
▲ MT425 higher · +23 (+2300%)OilPull E 30/601
MT42524
Median Agricultural Tractor16
OilPull E 30/60 is in the 1st percentile; MT425 is in the 81st · 972 models
Operating Weight
▲ OilPull E 30/60 higher · +20,118 lb (+325%)OilPull E 30/6026,300 lb
MT4256,182 lb
Median Agricultural Tractor10,914 lb
OilPull E 30/60 is in the 93rd percentile; MT425 is in the 21st · 971 models
OilPull E 30/60 (A)MT425 (B)Median Agricultural Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Advance-Rumely OilPull E 30/60 | Challenger MT425 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Advance-Rumely | Challenger | — |
| Model | OilPull E 30/60 | MT425 | — |
| Category | Agricultural | Utility | — |
Engine
| Spec | Advance-Rumely OilPull E 30/60 | Challenger MT425 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Rumley | Perkins | — |
| Model | Not recorded | 3054 | — |
| Rated RPM | Not recorded | 2,200RPM | — |
| Cylinders | 2 | 4 | ▲ MT425+2 · +100% |
| Displacement | 1,885ci | 243ci | ▲ OilPull E 30/60+1,642 ci · +676% |
| Bore | 10in | 3.9in | ▲ OilPull E 30/60+6.1 in · +156% |
| Stroke | 12in | 5in | ▲ OilPull E 30/60+7 in · +140% |
Transmission
| Spec | Advance-Rumely OilPull E 30/60 | Challenger MT425 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear | 24-speed power shuttle | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Advance-Rumely OilPull E 30/60 | Challenger MT425 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 228in | Not recorded | — |
| Width | 116in | 77in | ▲ OilPull E 30/60+39 in · +51% |
| Height | 132in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 26,300lb | 6,182lb | ▲ OilPull E 30/60+20,118 lb · +325% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Advance-Rumely OilPull E 30/60 | Challenger MT425 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Open center | — |
| Steering Type | Manual | Power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Advance-Rumely OilPull E 30/60 | Challenger MT425 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | II | — |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Advance-Rumely OilPull E 30/60 | Challenger MT425 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 2WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Manual | Power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Advance-Rumely OilPull E 30/60 | Challenger MT425 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Voltage | Not recorded | 12V | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Advance-Rumely OilPull E 30/60 | Challenger MT425 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 70gal | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Advance-Rumely OilPull E 30/60 | Challenger MT425 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | ROPS | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Displacement
median 336 ciA · 99th percentile (1,885 ci)B · 25th percentile (243 ci)
Cylinders
median 5.5A · 3rd percentile (2)B · 31st percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 1st percentile (1)B · 81st percentile (24)
Operating Weight
median 10,914 lbA · 93rd percentile (26,300 lb)B · 21st percentile (6,182 lb)
Width
median 79.5 inA · 94th percentile (116 in)B · 43rd percentile (77 in)
A · OilPull E 30/60B · MT425Median Agricultural Tractor