Image not recorded
Advance-RumelyModel A
Advance-Rumely OilPull E 30/60
Agricultural
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 1,885 ci
- Cylinders
- 2
- Forward gears
- 1
Head to head · Agricultural
Advance-Rumely OilPull E 30/60 vs Challenger MT565
ChallengerModel B
Challenger MT565
Row Crop
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 402 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 18
Advance-RumelyAdvance-Rumely OilPull E 30/60
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT565
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Agricultural
Engine Displacement
▲ OilPull E 30/60 higher · +1,483 ci (+369%)OilPull E 30/601,885 ci
MT565402 ci
Median Agricultural Tractor336 ci
OilPull E 30/60 is in the 99th percentile; MT565 is in the 66th · 1,083 models
Cylinders
▲ MT565 higher · +4 (+200%)OilPull E 30/602
MT5656
Median Agricultural Tractor5.5
OilPull E 30/60 is in the 3rd percentile; MT565 is in the 74th · 1,130 models
Forward Gears
▲ MT565 higher · +17 (+1700%)OilPull E 30/601
MT56518
Median Agricultural Tractor16
OilPull E 30/60 is in the 1st percentile; MT565 is in the 68th · 972 models
Operating Weight
▲ OilPull E 30/60 higher · +10,745 lb (+69%)OilPull E 30/6026,300 lb
MT56515,555 lb
Median Agricultural Tractor10,914 lb
OilPull E 30/60 is in the 93rd percentile; MT565 is in the 72nd · 971 models
OilPull E 30/60 (A)MT565 (B)Median Agricultural Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Advance-Rumely OilPull E 30/60 | Challenger MT565 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Advance-Rumely | Challenger | — |
| Model | OilPull E 30/60 | MT565 | — |
| Category | Agricultural | Row Crop | — |
Engine
| Spec | Advance-Rumely OilPull E 30/60 | Challenger MT565 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Rumley | SISU | — |
| Rated RPM | Not recorded | 2,200RPM | — |
| Cylinders | 2 | 6 | ▲ MT565+4 · +200% |
| Displacement | 1,885ci | 402ci | ▲ OilPull E 30/60+1,483 ci · +369% |
| Bore | 10in | 4.3in | ▲ OilPull E 30/60+5.7 in · +133% |
| Stroke | 12in | 4.7in | ▲ OilPull E 30/60+7.3 in · +155% |
Transmission
| Spec | Advance-Rumely OilPull E 30/60 | Challenger MT565 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear | Full power shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Advance-Rumely OilPull E 30/60 | Challenger MT565 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 228in | 198in | ▲ OilPull E 30/60+30 in · +15% |
| Width | 116in | 98in | ▲ OilPull E 30/60+18 in · +18% |
| Height | 132in | 120in | ▲ OilPull E 30/60+12 in · +10% |
| Operating Weight | 26,300lb | 15,555lb | ▲ OilPull E 30/60+10,745 lb · +69% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Advance-Rumely OilPull E 30/60 | Challenger MT565 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Closed center pressure flow compensated (PFC) | — |
| Steering Type | Manual | Power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Advance-Rumely OilPull E 30/60 | Challenger MT565 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | III | — |
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | Category 3 | — |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Advance-Rumely OilPull E 30/60 | Challenger MT565 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 2WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Manual | Power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Advance-Rumely OilPull E 30/60 | Challenger MT565 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Not recorded | Electric Starter | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Advance-Rumely OilPull E 30/60 | Challenger MT565 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 70gal | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Displacement
median 336 ciA · 99th percentile (1,885 ci)B · 66th percentile (402 ci)
Cylinders
median 5.5A · 3rd percentile (2)B · 74th percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 1st percentile (1)B · 68th percentile (18)
Operating Weight
median 10,914 lbA · 93rd percentile (26,300 lb)B · 72nd percentile (15,555 lb)
Length
median 173 inA · 92nd percentile (228 in)B · 77th percentile (198 in)
A · OilPull E 30/60B · MT565Median Agricultural Tractor