Image not recorded
Advance-RumelyModel A
Advance-Rumely OilPull F 15/30
Utility
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 943 ci
- Cylinders
- 1
- Forward gears
- 2
Head to head · Utility
Advance-Rumely OilPull F 15/30 vs CaseIH 254
CaseIHModel B
CaseIH 254
Sub-Compact
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 64.7 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 9
Advance-RumelyAdvance-Rumely OilPull F 15/30
vs
CaseIHCaseIH 254
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Displacement
▲ OilPull F 15/30 higher · +878 ci (+1357%)OilPull F 15/30943 ci
25464.7 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
OilPull F 15/30 is in the 99th percentile; 254 is in the 7th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ 254 higher · +2 (+200%)OilPull F 15/301
2543
Median Utility Tractor4
OilPull F 15/30 is in the 1st percentile; 254 is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ 254 higher · +7 (+350%)OilPull F 15/302
2549
Median Utility Tractor12
OilPull F 15/30 is in the 1st percentile; 254 is in the 35th · 4,941 models
Operating Weight
▲ OilPull F 15/30 higher · +14,550 lb (+746%)OilPull F 15/3016,500 lb
2541,950 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
OilPull F 15/30 is in the 94th percentile; 254 is in the 11th · 5,107 models
OilPull F 15/30 (A)254 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Advance-Rumely OilPull F 15/30 | CaseIH 254 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Advance-Rumely | CaseIH | — |
| Model | OilPull F 15/30 | 254 | — |
| Category | Utility, Standard Tread | Sub-Compact | — |
Engine
| Spec | Advance-Rumely OilPull F 15/30 | CaseIH 254 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Rumely | Mitsubishi | — |
| Cylinders | 1 | 3 | ▲ 254+2 · +200% |
| Displacement | 943ci | 64.7ci | ▲ OilPull F 15/30+878 ci · +1357% |
| Bore | 10in | Not recorded | — |
| Stroke | 12in | Not recorded | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Advance-Rumely OilPull F 15/30 | CaseIH 254 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear | Manual | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Advance-Rumely OilPull F 15/30 | CaseIH 254 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 192in | Not recorded | — |
| Width | 94in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 124in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 16,500lb | 1,950lb | ▲ OilPull F 15/30+14,550 lb · +746% |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Advance-Rumely OilPull F 15/30 | CaseIH 254 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | Three-Point Hitch | — |
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | I | — |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Advance-Rumely OilPull F 15/30 | CaseIH 254 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x2 2WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 2WD | Same |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 99th percentile (943 ci)B · 7th percentile (64.7 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 1st percentile (1)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 1st percentile (2)B · 35th percentile (9)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 94th percentile (16,500 lb)B · 11th percentile (1,950 lb)
A · OilPull F 15/30B · 254Median Utility Tractor