Image not recorded
Advance-RumelyModel A
Advance-Rumely OilPull F 15/30
Utility
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 943 ci
- Cylinders
- 1
- Forward gears
- 2
Head to head · Utility
Advance-Rumely OilPull F 15/30 vs Challenger 55
ChallengerModel B
Challenger 55
Agricultural
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 442 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 16
Advance-RumelyAdvance-Rumely OilPull F 15/30
vs
ChallengerChallenger 55
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Displacement
▲ OilPull F 15/30 higher · +501 ci (+113%)OilPull F 15/30943 ci
55442 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
OilPull F 15/30 is in the 99th percentile; 55 is in the 92nd · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ 55 higher · +5 (+500%)OilPull F 15/301
556
Median Utility Tractor4
OilPull F 15/30 is in the 1st percentile; 55 is in the 93rd · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ 55 higher · +14 (+700%)OilPull F 15/302
5516
Median Utility Tractor12
OilPull F 15/30 is in the 1st percentile; 55 is in the 73rd · 4,941 models
Operating Weight
▲ 55 higher · +9,500 lb (+58%)OilPull F 15/3016,500 lb
5526,000 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
OilPull F 15/30 is in the 94th percentile; 55 is in the 96th · 5,107 models
OilPull F 15/30 (A)55 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Advance-Rumely OilPull F 15/30 | Challenger 55 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Advance-Rumely | Challenger | — |
| Model | OilPull F 15/30 | 55 | — |
| Category | Utility, Standard Tread | Agricultural | — |
Engine
| Spec | Advance-Rumely OilPull F 15/30 | Challenger 55 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Rumely | Caterpillar | — |
| Model | Not recorded | 3126 | — |
| Rated RPM | Not recorded | 2,100RPM | — |
| Cylinders | 1 | 6 | ▲ 55+5 · +500% |
| Displacement | 943ci | 442ci | ▲ OilPull F 15/30+501 ci · +113% |
| Bore | 10in | 4.3in | ▲ OilPull F 15/30+5.7 in · +133% |
| Stroke | 12in | 5in | ▲ OilPull F 15/30+7 in · +140% |
Transmission
| Spec | Advance-Rumely OilPull F 15/30 | Challenger 55 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear | Full Power Shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Advance-Rumely OilPull F 15/30 | Challenger 55 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 192in | 211in | ▲ 55+19 in · +10% |
| Width | 94in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 124in | 125in | ▲ 55+1 in · <1% |
| Operating Weight | 16,500lb | 26,000lb | ▲ 55+9,500 lb · +58% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Advance-Rumely OilPull F 15/30 | Challenger 55 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Variable-Displacement Load-Sensing Pressure-Compensated | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Differential Power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Advance-Rumely OilPull F 15/30 | Challenger 55 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | Three-Point Hitch | — |
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | III | — |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Advance-Rumely OilPull F 15/30 | Challenger 55 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Differential Power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Advance-Rumely OilPull F 15/30 | Challenger 55 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Not recorded | Electric | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Advance-Rumely OilPull F 15/30 | Challenger 55 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 8.6gal | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Advance-Rumely OilPull F 15/30 | Challenger 55 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Cab | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 99th percentile (943 ci)B · 92nd percentile (442 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 1st percentile (1)B · 93rd percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 1st percentile (2)B · 73rd percentile (16)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 94th percentile (16,500 lb)B · 96th percentile (26,000 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 93rd percentile (192 in)B · 95th percentile (211 in)
A · OilPull F 15/30B · 55Median Utility Tractor