Head to head · Utility

Advance-Rumely OilPull F 15/30 vs Challenger MT565

Image not recorded
Advance-RumelyModel A

Advance-Rumely OilPull F 15/30

Utility

power
Not recorded
displacement
943 ci
Cylinders
1
Forward gears
2
Full OilPull F 15/30 specs
Challenger MT565 Tractor
ChallengerModel B

Challenger MT565

Row Crop

power
Not recorded
displacement
402 ci
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
18
Full MT565 specs
Advance-RumelyAdvance-Rumely OilPull F 15/30
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT565

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Utility

n = 3,9335,720

Engine Displacement

▲ OilPull F 15/30 higher · +541 ci (+135%)
OilPull F 15/30943 ci
MT565402 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci

OilPull F 15/30 is in the 99th percentile; MT565 is in the 90th · 5,580 models

Cylinders

▲ MT565 higher · +5 (+500%)
OilPull F 15/301
MT5656
Median Utility Tractor4

OilPull F 15/30 is in the 1st percentile; MT565 is in the 93rd · 5,720 models

Forward Gears

▲ MT565 higher · +16 (+800%)
OilPull F 15/302
MT56518
Median Utility Tractor12

OilPull F 15/30 is in the 1st percentile; MT565 is in the 83rd · 4,941 models

Operating Weight

▲ OilPull F 15/30 higher · +945 lb (+6%)
OilPull F 15/3016,500 lb
MT56515,555 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb

OilPull F 15/30 is in the 94th percentile; MT565 is in the 93rd · 5,107 models

OilPull F 15/30 (A)MT565 (B)Median Utility Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecAdvance-Rumely OilPull F 15/30Challenger MT565Difference
ManufacturerAdvance-RumelyChallenger
ModelOilPull F 15/30MT565
CategoryUtility, Standard TreadRow Crop

Engine

SpecAdvance-Rumely OilPull F 15/30Challenger MT565Difference
ManufacturerRumelySISU
Rated RPMNot recorded2,200RPM
Cylinders16MT565+5 · +500%
Displacement943ci402ciOilPull F 15/30+541 ci · +135%
Bore10in4.3inOilPull F 15/30+5.7 in · +133%
Stroke12in4.7inOilPull F 15/30+7.3 in · +155%

Transmission

SpecAdvance-Rumely OilPull F 15/30Challenger MT565Difference
TypeGearFull power shift

Dimensions & Weight

SpecAdvance-Rumely OilPull F 15/30Challenger MT565Difference
Length192in198inMT565+6 in · +3%
Width94in98inMT565+4 in · +4%
Height124in120inOilPull F 15/30+4 in · +3%
Operating Weight16,500lb15,555lbOilPull F 15/30+945 lb · +6%

Hydraulics

SpecAdvance-Rumely OilPull F 15/30Challenger MT565Difference
System TypeNot recordedClosed center pressure flow compensated (PFC)
Steering TypeNot recordedPower

Hitch & Towing

SpecAdvance-Rumely OilPull F 15/30Challenger MT565Difference
Hitch TypeNot recordedIII
Hitch CategoryNot recordedCategory 3
Hitch PositionNot recordedRear

Chassis & Drive

SpecAdvance-Rumely OilPull F 15/30Challenger MT565Difference
Chassis Type4x2 2WD4x2 2WDSame
Drive Type2WD2WDSame
Steering TypeNot recordedPower

Electrical

SpecAdvance-Rumely OilPull F 15/30Challenger MT565Difference
Starter TypeNot recordedElectric Starter

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Displacement

median 183 ci
A · 99th percentile (943 ci)B · 90th percentile (402 ci)

Cylinders

median 4
A · 1st percentile (1)B · 93rd percentile (6)

Forward Gears

median 12
A · 1st percentile (2)B · 83rd percentile (18)

Operating Weight

median 5,303 lb
A · 94th percentile (16,500 lb)B · 93rd percentile (15,555 lb)

Length

median 137 in
A · 93rd percentile (192 in)B · 94th percentile (198 in)
A · OilPull F 15/30B · MT565Median Utility Tractor
Full spec pageAdvance-Rumely OilPull F 15/30Full spec pageChallenger MT565