Image not recorded
Advance-RumelyModel A
Advance-Rumely OilPull F 15/30
Utility
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 943 ci
- Cylinders
- 1
- Forward gears
- 2
Head to head · Utility
Advance-Rumely OilPull F 15/30 vs Challenger MT665
Image not recorded
ChallengerModel B
Challenger MT665
Row Crop
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 513 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 18
Advance-RumelyAdvance-Rumely OilPull F 15/30
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT665
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Displacement
▲ OilPull F 15/30 higher · +430 ci (+84%)OilPull F 15/30943 ci
MT665513 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
OilPull F 15/30 is in the 99th percentile; MT665 is in the 94th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ MT665 higher · +5 (+500%)OilPull F 15/301
MT6656
Median Utility Tractor4
OilPull F 15/30 is in the 1st percentile; MT665 is in the 93rd · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ MT665 higher · +16 (+800%)OilPull F 15/302
MT66518
Median Utility Tractor12
OilPull F 15/30 is in the 1st percentile; MT665 is in the 83rd · 4,941 models
Operating Weight
▲ MT665 higher · +5,000 lb (+30%)OilPull F 15/3016,500 lb
MT66521,500 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
OilPull F 15/30 is in the 94th percentile; MT665 is in the 95th · 5,107 models
OilPull F 15/30 (A)MT665 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Advance-Rumely OilPull F 15/30 | Challenger MT665 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Advance-Rumely | Challenger | — |
| Model | OilPull F 15/30 | MT665 | — |
| Category | Utility, Standard Tread | Row Crop | — |
Engine
| Spec | Advance-Rumely OilPull F 15/30 | Challenger MT665 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Rumely | Sisu | — |
| Rated RPM | Not recorded | 2,200RPM | — |
| Cylinders | 1 | 6 | ▲ MT665+5 · +500% |
| Displacement | 943ci | 513ci | ▲ OilPull F 15/30+430 ci · +84% |
| Bore | 10in | 4.4in | ▲ OilPull F 15/30+5.6 in · +127% |
| Stroke | 12in | 5.7in | ▲ OilPull F 15/30+6.3 in · +111% |
Transmission
| Spec | Advance-Rumely OilPull F 15/30 | Challenger MT665 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear | 18-speed power shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Advance-Rumely OilPull F 15/30 | Challenger MT665 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 192in | 203in | ▲ MT665+11 in · +6% |
| Width | 94in | 98.2in | ▲ MT665+4.2 in · +4% |
| Height | 124in | 121in | ▲ OilPull F 15/30+3 in · +2% |
| Wheelbase | Not recorded | 121in | — |
| Operating Weight | 16,500lb | 21,500lb | ▲ MT665+5,000 lb · +30% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Advance-Rumely OilPull F 15/30 | Challenger MT665 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Closed center pressure flow compensated (PFC) | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Advance-Rumely OilPull F 15/30 | Challenger MT665 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | Three-Point Hitch | — |
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | III | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Advance-Rumely OilPull F 15/30 | Challenger MT665 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Advance-Rumely OilPull F 15/30 | Challenger MT665 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Not recorded | Electric | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Advance-Rumely OilPull F 15/30 | Challenger MT665 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Cab | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 99th percentile (943 ci)B · 94th percentile (513 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 1st percentile (1)B · 93rd percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 1st percentile (2)B · 83rd percentile (18)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 94th percentile (16,500 lb)B · 95th percentile (21,500 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 93rd percentile (192 in)B · 94th percentile (203 in)
A · OilPull F 15/30B · MT665Median Utility Tractor