Head to head · Utility

Advance-Rumely OilPull F 15/30 vs Claas Challenger 55

Image not recorded
Advance-RumelyModel A

Advance-Rumely OilPull F 15/30

Utility

power
Not recorded
displacement
943 ci
Cylinders
1
Forward gears
2
Full OilPull F 15/30 specs
Advance-RumelyAdvance-Rumely OilPull F 15/30
vs
ClaasClaas Challenger 55

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Utility

n = 3,9335,720

Engine Displacement

▲ OilPull F 15/30 higher · +501 ci (+113%)
OilPull F 15/30943 ci
Challenger 55442 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci

OilPull F 15/30 is in the 99th percentile; Challenger 55 is in the 92nd · 5,580 models

Cylinders

▲ Challenger 55 higher · +5 (+500%)
OilPull F 15/301
Challenger 556
Median Utility Tractor4

OilPull F 15/30 is in the 1st percentile; Challenger 55 is in the 93rd · 5,720 models

Forward Gears

▲ Challenger 55 higher · +14 (+700%)
OilPull F 15/302
Challenger 5516
Median Utility Tractor12

OilPull F 15/30 is in the 1st percentile; Challenger 55 is in the 73rd · 4,941 models

Operating Weight

▲ Challenger 55 higher · +9,500 lb (+58%)
OilPull F 15/3016,500 lb
Challenger 5526,000 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb

OilPull F 15/30 is in the 94th percentile; Challenger 55 is in the 96th · 5,107 models

OilPull F 15/30 (A)Challenger 55 (B)Median Utility Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecAdvance-Rumely OilPull F 15/30Claas Challenger 55Difference
ManufacturerAdvance-RumelyClaas
ModelOilPull F 15/30Challenger 55
CategoryUtility, Standard TreadCrawler, Agricultural

Engine

SpecAdvance-Rumely OilPull F 15/30Claas Challenger 55Difference
ManufacturerRumelyCaterpillar
ModelNot recorded3126
Rated RPMNot recorded2,100RPM
Cylinders16Challenger 55+5 · +500%
Displacement943ci442ciOilPull F 15/30+501 ci · +113%
Bore10in4.3inOilPull F 15/30+5.7 in · +133%
Stroke12in5inOilPull F 15/30+7 in · +140%

Transmission

SpecAdvance-Rumely OilPull F 15/30Claas Challenger 55Difference
TypeGearFull Power Shift

Dimensions & Weight

SpecAdvance-Rumely OilPull F 15/30Claas Challenger 55Difference
Length192in211inChallenger 55+19 in · +10%
Width94in91inOilPull F 15/30+3 in · +3%
Height124in125inChallenger 55+1 in · <1%
Operating Weight16,500lb26,000lbChallenger 55+9,500 lb · +58%

Hydraulics

SpecAdvance-Rumely OilPull F 15/30Claas Challenger 55Difference
System TypeNot recordedVariable-displacement Load-sensing Pressure-compensated
Steering TypeNot recordedDifferential Power

Hitch & Towing

SpecAdvance-Rumely OilPull F 15/30Claas Challenger 55Difference
Hitch CategoryNot recordedIII/II
Hitch PositionNot recordedRear

Chassis & Drive

SpecAdvance-Rumely OilPull F 15/30Claas Challenger 55Difference
Chassis Type4x2 2WDCrawler
Drive Type2WDNot recorded
Steering TypeNot recordedDifferential Power

Electrical

SpecAdvance-Rumely OilPull F 15/30Claas Challenger 55Difference
Battery VoltageNot recorded12V
Starter TypeNot recordedElectric

Capacities

SpecAdvance-Rumely OilPull F 15/30Claas Challenger 55Difference
CoolantNot recorded8.6gal

Operator Station

SpecAdvance-Rumely OilPull F 15/30Claas Challenger 55Difference
TypeNot recordedCab

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Displacement

median 183 ci
A · 99th percentile (943 ci)B · 92nd percentile (442 ci)

Cylinders

median 4
A · 1st percentile (1)B · 93rd percentile (6)

Forward Gears

median 12
A · 1st percentile (2)B · 73rd percentile (16)

Operating Weight

median 5,303 lb
A · 94th percentile (16,500 lb)B · 96th percentile (26,000 lb)

Length

median 137 in
A · 93rd percentile (192 in)B · 95th percentile (211 in)
A · OilPull F 15/30B · Challenger 55Median Utility Tractor
Full spec pageAdvance-Rumely OilPull F 15/30Full spec pageClaas Challenger 55