Head to head · Utility

Advance-Rumely OilPull F 15/30 vs Cockshutt 1755

Image not recorded
Advance-RumelyModel A

Advance-Rumely OilPull F 15/30

Utility

power
Not recorded
displacement
943 ci
Cylinders
1
Forward gears
2
Full OilPull F 15/30 specs
Image not recorded
CockshuttModel B

Cockshutt 1755

Row Crop

power
Not recorded
displacement
310 ci
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
6
Full 1755 specs
Advance-RumelyAdvance-Rumely OilPull F 15/30
vs
CockshuttCockshutt 1755

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Utility

n = 3,933–5,720

Engine Displacement

▲ OilPull F 15/30 higher · +633 ci (+204%)
OilPull F 15/30943 ci
1755310 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci

OilPull F 15/30 is in the 99th percentile; 1755 is in the 85th · 5,580 models

Cylinders

▲ 1755 higher · +5 (+500%)
OilPull F 15/301
17556
Median Utility Tractor4

OilPull F 15/30 is in the 1st percentile; 1755 is in the 93rd · 5,720 models

Forward Gears

▲ 1755 higher · +4 (+200%)
OilPull F 15/302
17556
Median Utility Tractor12

OilPull F 15/30 is in the 1st percentile; 1755 is in the 11th · 4,941 models

Operating Weight

▲ OilPull F 15/30 higher · +6,900 lb (+72%)
OilPull F 15/3016,500 lb
17559,600 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb

OilPull F 15/30 is in the 94th percentile; 1755 is in the 84th · 5,107 models

OilPull F 15/30 (A)1755 (B)Median Utility Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecAdvance-Rumely OilPull F 15/30Cockshutt 1755Difference
ManufacturerAdvance-RumelyCockshutt—
ModelOilPull F 15/301755—
CategoryUtility, Standard TreadRow Crop—

Engine

SpecAdvance-Rumely OilPull F 15/30Cockshutt 1755Difference
ManufacturerRumelyWaukesha-Oliver—
Rated RPMNot recorded2,400RPM—
Cylinders16▲ 1755+5 · +500%
Displacement943ci310ci▲ OilPull F 15/30+633 ci · +204%
Bore10in3.9in▲ OilPull F 15/30+6.1 in · +156%
Stroke12in4.4in▲ OilPull F 15/30+7.6 in · +173%

Transmission

SpecAdvance-Rumely OilPull F 15/30Cockshutt 1755Difference
TypeGearGearSame

Dimensions & Weight

SpecAdvance-Rumely OilPull F 15/30Cockshutt 1755Difference
Length192in160in▲ OilPull F 15/30+32 in · +20%
Width94in80.6in▲ OilPull F 15/30+13.4 in · +17%
Height124in85.5in▲ OilPull F 15/30+38.5 in · +45%
Operating Weight16,500lb9,600lb▲ OilPull F 15/30+6,900 lb · +72%

Hydraulics

SpecAdvance-Rumely OilPull F 15/30Cockshutt 1755Difference
System TypeNot recordedClosed Center—
Steering TypeNot recordedPower—

Tires

SpecAdvance-Rumely OilPull F 15/30Cockshutt 1755Difference
Front Tire SizeNot recorded7.5-15—
Rear Tire SizeNot recorded18.4-34—

Hitch & Towing

SpecAdvance-Rumely OilPull F 15/30Cockshutt 1755Difference
Hitch CategoryNot recordedI/II—

Chassis & Drive

SpecAdvance-Rumely OilPull F 15/30Cockshutt 1755Difference
Chassis Type4x2 2WD4x2 2WDSame
Drive Type2WD2WDSame
Steering TypeNot recordedPower—

Electrical

SpecAdvance-Rumely OilPull F 15/30Cockshutt 1755Difference
Battery VoltageNot recorded12V—
Starter TypeNot recordedElectric—

Capacities

SpecAdvance-Rumely OilPull F 15/30Cockshutt 1755Difference
CoolantNot recorded5gal—

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Displacement

median 183 ci
A · 99th percentile (943 ci)B · 85th percentile (310 ci)

Cylinders

median 4
A · 1st percentile (1)B · 93rd percentile (6)

Forward Gears

median 12
A · 1st percentile (2)B · 11th percentile (6)

Operating Weight

median 5,303 lb
A · 94th percentile (16,500 lb)B · 84th percentile (9,600 lb)

Length

median 137 in
A · 93rd percentile (192 in)B · 77th percentile (160 in)
A · OilPull F 15/30B · 1755Median Utility Tractor
Full spec pageAdvance-Rumely OilPull F 15/30Full spec pageCockshutt 1755