Image not recorded
Advance-RumelyModel A
Advance-Rumely OilPull F 15/30
Utility
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 943 ci
- Cylinders
- 1
- Forward gears
- 2
Head to head · Utility
Utility
Row Crop
How they compare
OilPull F 15/30 is in the 99th percentile; 976 is in the 87th · 5,580 models
OilPull F 15/30 is in the 1st percentile; 976 is in the 93rd · 5,720 models
OilPull F 15/30 is in the 1st percentile; 976 is in the 73rd · 4,941 models
Full comparison
| Spec | Advance-Rumely OilPull F 15/30 | International Harvester 976 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Advance-Rumely | International Harvester | — |
| Model | OilPull F 15/30 | 976 | — |
| Category | Utility, Standard Tread | Row Crop | — |
| Spec | Advance-Rumely OilPull F 15/30 | International Harvester 976 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Rumely | International Harvester | — |
| Model | Not recorded | DT-358 | — |
| Cylinders | 1 | 6 | ▲ 976+5 · +500% |
| Displacement | 943ci | 358ci | ▲ OilPull F 15/30+585 ci · +163% |
| Bore | 10in | 3.9in | ▲ OilPull F 15/30+6.1 in · +156% |
| Stroke | 12in | 5.1in | ▲ OilPull F 15/30+6.9 in · +135% |
| Spec | Advance-Rumely OilPull F 15/30 | International Harvester 976 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear | Two-speed power shift | — |
| Spec | Advance-Rumely OilPull F 15/30 | International Harvester 976 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 192in | Not recorded | — |
| Width | 94in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 124in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 16,500lb | Not recorded | — |
| Spec | Advance-Rumely OilPull F 15/30 | International Harvester 976 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | III | — |
| Spec | Advance-Rumely OilPull F 15/30 | International Harvester 976 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x2 2WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 2WD | Same |
| Spec | Advance-Rumely OilPull F 15/30 | International Harvester 976 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Not recorded | Electric | — |
Category context