Image not recorded
Advance-RumelyModel A
Advance-Rumely OilPull F 15/30
Utility
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 943 ci
- Cylinders
- 1
- Forward gears
- 2
Head to head · Utility
Advance-Rumely OilPull F 15/30 vs Minneapolis-Moline M-670
Image not recorded
Minneapolis-MolineModel B
Minneapolis-Moline M-670
Utility
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 336 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 10
Advance-RumelyAdvance-Rumely OilPull F 15/30
vs
Minneapolis-MolineMinneapolis-Moline M-670
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Displacement
▲ OilPull F 15/30 higher · +607 ci (+181%)OilPull F 15/30943 ci
M-670336 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
OilPull F 15/30 is in the 99th percentile; M-670 is in the 86th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ M-670 higher · +3 (+300%)OilPull F 15/301
M-6704
Median Utility Tractor4
OilPull F 15/30 is in the 1st percentile; M-670 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ M-670 higher · +8 (+400%)OilPull F 15/302
M-67010
Median Utility Tractor12
OilPull F 15/30 is in the 1st percentile; M-670 is in the 39th · 4,941 models
Operating Weight
▲ OilPull F 15/30 higher · +10,150 lb (+160%)OilPull F 15/3016,500 lb
M-6706,350 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
OilPull F 15/30 is in the 94th percentile; M-670 is in the 60th · 5,107 models
OilPull F 15/30 (A)M-670 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Advance-Rumely OilPull F 15/30 | Minneapolis-Moline M-670 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Advance-Rumely | Minneapolis-Moline | — |
| Model | OilPull F 15/30 | M-670 | — |
| Category | Utility, Standard Tread | Utility | — |
Engine
| Spec | Advance-Rumely OilPull F 15/30 | Minneapolis-Moline M-670 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Rumely | Minneapolis-Moline | — |
| Model | Not recorded | 5.5L 4-cyl | — |
| Rated RPM | Not recorded | 1,600RPM | — |
| Cylinders | 1 | 4 | ▲ M-670+3 · +300% |
| Displacement | 943ci | 336ci | ▲ OilPull F 15/30+607 ci · +181% |
| Bore | 10in | 4.6in | ▲ OilPull F 15/30+5.4 in · +117% |
| Stroke | 12in | 5in | ▲ OilPull F 15/30+7 in · +140% |
Transmission
| Spec | Advance-Rumely OilPull F 15/30 | Minneapolis-Moline M-670 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear | Two-speed power shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Advance-Rumely OilPull F 15/30 | Minneapolis-Moline M-670 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 192in | Not recorded | — |
| Width | 94in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 124in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 16,500lb | 6,350lb | ▲ OilPull F 15/30+10,150 lb · +160% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Advance-Rumely OilPull F 15/30 | Minneapolis-Moline M-670 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Open Center | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Advance-Rumely OilPull F 15/30 | Minneapolis-Moline M-670 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | Three-Point Hitch | — |
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | II | — |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Advance-Rumely OilPull F 15/30 | Minneapolis-Moline M-670 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x2 | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 2WD | Same |
Electrical
| Spec | Advance-Rumely OilPull F 15/30 | Minneapolis-Moline M-670 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Not recorded | Electric | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Advance-Rumely OilPull F 15/30 | Minneapolis-Moline M-670 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 5.5gal | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Advance-Rumely OilPull F 15/30 | Minneapolis-Moline M-670 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Open | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 99th percentile (943 ci)B · 86th percentile (336 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 1st percentile (1)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 1st percentile (2)B · 39th percentile (10)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 94th percentile (16,500 lb)B · 60th percentile (6,350 lb)
A · OilPull F 15/30B · M-670Median Utility Tractor