Image not recorded
Advance-RumelyModel A
Advance-Rumely OilPull F 15/30
Utility
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 943 ci
- Cylinders
- 1
- Forward gears
- 2
Head to head · Standard Tread
Advance-Rumely OilPull F 15/30 vs Minneapolis-Moline M-670 Super
Image not recorded
Minneapolis-MolineModel B
Minneapolis-Moline M-670 Super
Standard Tread
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 336 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 10
Advance-RumelyAdvance-Rumely OilPull F 15/30
vs
Minneapolis-MolineMinneapolis-Moline M-670 Super
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Standard Tread
Engine Displacement
▲ OilPull F 15/30 higher · +607 ci (+181%)OilPull F 15/30943 ci
M-670 Super336 ci
Median Standard Tread Tractor382 ci
OilPull F 15/30 is in the 92nd percentile; M-670 Super is in the 43rd · 353 models
Cylinders
▲ M-670 Super higher · +3 (+300%)OilPull F 15/301
M-670 Super4
Median Standard Tread Tractor4
OilPull F 15/30 is in the 7th percentile; M-670 Super is in the 50th · 367 models
Forward Gears
▲ M-670 Super higher · +8 (+400%)OilPull F 15/302
M-670 Super10
Median Standard Tread Tractor4
OilPull F 15/30 is in the 19th percentile; M-670 Super is in the 96th · 341 models
Operating Weight
▲ OilPull F 15/30 higher · +10,150 lb (+160%)OilPull F 15/3016,500 lb
M-670 Super6,350 lb
Median Standard Tread Tractor6,834 lb
OilPull F 15/30 is in the 90th percentile; M-670 Super is in the 41st · 297 models
OilPull F 15/30 (A)M-670 Super (B)Median Standard Tread Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Advance-Rumely OilPull F 15/30 | Minneapolis-Moline M-670 Super | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Advance-Rumely | Minneapolis-Moline | — |
| Model | OilPull F 15/30 | M-670 Super | — |
| Category | Utility, Standard Tread | Standard Tread | — |
Engine
| Spec | Advance-Rumely OilPull F 15/30 | Minneapolis-Moline M-670 Super | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Rumely | Minneapolis-Moline | — |
| Rated RPM | Not recorded | 1,600RPM | — |
| Cylinders | 1 | 4 | ▲ M-670 Super+3 · +300% |
| Displacement | 943ci | 336ci | ▲ OilPull F 15/30+607 ci · +181% |
| Bore | 10in | 4.6in | ▲ OilPull F 15/30+5.4 in · +117% |
| Stroke | 12in | 5in | ▲ OilPull F 15/30+7 in · +140% |
Transmission
| Spec | Advance-Rumely OilPull F 15/30 | Minneapolis-Moline M-670 Super | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear | Two-speed power shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Advance-Rumely OilPull F 15/30 | Minneapolis-Moline M-670 Super | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 192in | Not recorded | — |
| Width | 94in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 124in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 16,500lb | 6,350lb | ▲ OilPull F 15/30+10,150 lb · +160% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Advance-Rumely OilPull F 15/30 | Minneapolis-Moline M-670 Super | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Open center | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Advance-Rumely OilPull F 15/30 | Minneapolis-Moline M-670 Super | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | II | — |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Advance-Rumely OilPull F 15/30 | Minneapolis-Moline M-670 Super | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Advance-Rumely OilPull F 15/30 | Minneapolis-Moline M-670 Super | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Not recorded | Electric | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Advance-Rumely OilPull F 15/30 | Minneapolis-Moline M-670 Super | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 5.5gal | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Displacement
median 382 ciA · 92nd percentile (943 ci)B · 43rd percentile (336 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 7th percentile (1)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 4A · 19th percentile (2)B · 96th percentile (10)
Operating Weight
median 6,834 lbA · 90th percentile (16,500 lb)B · 41st percentile (6,350 lb)
A · OilPull F 15/30B · M-670 SuperMedian Standard Tread Tractor