Image not recorded
Advance-RumelyModel A
Advance-Rumely OilPull F 15/30
Utility
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 943 ci
- Cylinders
- 1
- Forward gears
- 2
Head to head · Utility
Advance-Rumely OilPull F 15/30 vs Minneapolis-Moline ZTS
Minneapolis-MolineModel B
Minneapolis-Moline ZTS
Utility
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 186 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 5
Advance-RumelyAdvance-Rumely OilPull F 15/30
vs
Minneapolis-MolineMinneapolis-Moline ZTS
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Displacement
▲ OilPull F 15/30 higher · +757 ci (+407%)OilPull F 15/30943 ci
ZTS186 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
OilPull F 15/30 is in the 99th percentile; ZTS is in the 50th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ ZTS higher · +3 (+300%)OilPull F 15/301
ZTS4
Median Utility Tractor4
OilPull F 15/30 is in the 1st percentile; ZTS is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ ZTS higher · +3 (+150%)OilPull F 15/302
ZTS5
Median Utility Tractor12
OilPull F 15/30 is in the 1st percentile; ZTS is in the 6th · 4,941 models
OilPull F 15/30 (A)ZTS (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Advance-Rumely OilPull F 15/30 | Minneapolis-Moline ZTS | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Advance-Rumely | Minneapolis-Moline | — |
| Model | OilPull F 15/30 | ZTS | — |
| Category | Utility, Standard Tread | Utility, Standard Tread | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Advance-Rumely OilPull F 15/30 | Minneapolis-Moline ZTS | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Rumely | Minneapolis-Moline | — |
| Model | Not recorded | RE | — |
| Rated RPM | Not recorded | 1,500RPM | — |
| Cylinders | 1 | 4 | ▲ ZTS+3 · +300% |
| Displacement | 943ci | 186ci | ▲ OilPull F 15/30+757 ci · +407% |
| Bore | 10in | 3.6in | ▲ OilPull F 15/30+6.4 in · +178% |
| Stroke | 12in | 4.5in | ▲ OilPull F 15/30+7.5 in · +167% |
Transmission
| Spec | Advance-Rumely OilPull F 15/30 | Minneapolis-Moline ZTS | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear | Unsynchronized gear | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Advance-Rumely OilPull F 15/30 | Minneapolis-Moline ZTS | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 192in | Not recorded | — |
| Width | 94in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 124in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 16,500lb | Not recorded | — |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Advance-Rumely OilPull F 15/30 | Minneapolis-Moline ZTS | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Manual | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Advance-Rumely OilPull F 15/30 | Minneapolis-Moline ZTS | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x2 2WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 2WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Manual | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 99th percentile (943 ci)B · 50th percentile (186 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 1st percentile (1)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 1st percentile (2)B · 6th percentile (5)
A · OilPull F 15/30B · ZTSMedian Utility Tractor