Image not recorded
Head to head · Row Crop
AGCO DT160 vs CaseIH Puma 160
CaseIHModel B
CaseIH Puma 160
Row Crop
- power
- 160 hp
- displacement
- 411 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 18
AGCOAGCO DT160
vs
CaseIHCaseIH Puma 160
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop
Engine Power
= Effectively tiedDT160160 hp
Puma 160160 hp
Median Row Crop Tractor138 hp
DT160 is in the 62nd percentile; Puma 160 is in the 62nd · 1,206 models
Engine Displacement
▲ DT160 higher · +94 ci (+23%)DT160505 ci
Puma 160411 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci
DT160 is in the 89th percentile; Puma 160 is in the 60th · 1,409 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedDT1606
Puma 1606
Median Row Crop Tractor6
DT160 is in the 50th percentile; Puma 160 is in the 50th · 1,417 models
Forward Gears
= Effectively tiedDT16018
Puma 16018
Median Row Crop Tractor16
DT160 is in the 61st percentile; Puma 160 is in the 61st · 1,200 models
DT160 (A)Puma 160 (B)Median Row Crop Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | AGCO DT160 | CaseIH Puma 160 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AGCO | CaseIH | — |
| Model | DT160 | Puma 160 | — |
| Category | Row Crop | Row Crop | Same |
Engine
| Spec | AGCO DT160 | CaseIH Puma 160 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Cummins | FPT | — |
| Model | C8.3 | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 160hp | 160hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,200RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 505ci | 411ci | ▲ DT160+94 ci · +23% |
| Bore | 4.5in | 4.1in | ▲ DT160+0.4 in · +10% |
| Stroke | 5.3in | 5.2in | ▲ DT160+0.1 in · +2% |
Transmission
| Spec | AGCO DT160 | CaseIH Puma 160 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full power shift | Full power shift | Same |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | AGCO DT160 | CaseIH Puma 160 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 203in | Not recorded | — |
| Width | 98.2in | 61.4in | ▲ DT160+36.8 in · +60% |
| Height | 121in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 18,500lb | 16,360lb | ▲ DT160+2,140 lb · +13% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | AGCO DT160 | CaseIH Puma 160 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed center pressure flow compensated (PFC) | Closed center pressure flow compensating (PFC) | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Not recorded | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | AGCO DT160 | CaseIH Puma 160 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Independent | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 1 | 540rpm | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 2 | 1,000rpm | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | AGCO DT160 | CaseIH Puma 160 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-point | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | III/IIIN | 2/3N | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Capacity | 16,000lb | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | AGCO DT160 | CaseIH Puma 160 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Not recorded | — |
| Brake Type | Hydraulic wet disc | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | AGCO DT160 | CaseIH Puma 160 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Emissions
| Spec | AGCO DT160 | CaseIH Puma 160 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Standard | Not recorded | Interim Tier 4 | — |
| Control System | Not recorded | selective catalytic reduction (SCR) | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | AGCO DT160 | CaseIH Puma 160 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Cab | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 138 hpA · 62nd percentile (160 hp)B · 62nd percentile (160 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 391 ciA · 89th percentile (505 ci)B · 60th percentile (411 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 61st percentile (18)B · 61st percentile (18)
Operating Weight
median 12,307 lbA · 80th percentile (18,500 lb)B · 71st percentile (16,360 lb)
A · DT160B · Puma 160Median Row Crop Tractor