Image not recorded
Head to head · Row Crop
AGCO DT160 vs Ursus 1674 Forte
UrsusModel B
Ursus 1674 Forte
Agricultural
- power
- 156 hp
- displacement
- 402 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 16
AGCOAGCO DT160
vs
UrsusUrsus 1674 Forte
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop
Engine Power
▲ DT160 higher · +4 hp (+3%)DT160160 hp
1674 Forte156 hp
Median Row Crop Tractor138 hp
DT160 is in the 62nd percentile; 1674 Forte is in the 60th · 1,206 models
Engine Displacement
▲ DT160 higher · +103 ci (+26%)DT160505 ci
1674 Forte402 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci
DT160 is in the 89th percentile; 1674 Forte is in the 52nd · 1,409 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedDT1606
1674 Forte6
Median Row Crop Tractor6
DT160 is in the 50th percentile; 1674 Forte is in the 50th · 1,417 models
Forward Gears
▲ DT160 higher · +2 (+13%)DT16018
1674 Forte16
Median Row Crop Tractor16
DT160 is in the 61st percentile; 1674 Forte is in the 50th · 1,200 models
DT160 (A)1674 Forte (B)Median Row Crop Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | AGCO DT160 | Ursus 1674 Forte | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AGCO | Ursus | — |
| Model | DT160 | 1674 Forte | — |
| Category | Row Crop | Agricultural | — |
Engine
| Spec | AGCO DT160 | Ursus 1674 Forte | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Cummins | Perkins | — |
| Model | C8.3 | 1106D-E66TA | — |
| Power Output | 160hp | 156hp | ▲ DT160+4 hp · +3% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | Not recorded | — |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 505ci | 402ci | ▲ DT160+103 ci · +26% |
| Bore | 4.5in | 4.3in | ▲ DT160+0.2 in · +5% |
| Stroke | 5.3in | 4.7in | ▲ DT160+0.6 in · +13% |
Transmission
| Spec | AGCO DT160 | Ursus 1674 Forte | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full power shift | Not recorded | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | AGCO DT160 | Ursus 1674 Forte | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 203in | 181in | ▲ DT160+22 in · +12% |
| Width | 98.2in | 90.6in | ▲ DT160+7.6 in · +8% |
| Height | 121in | 124in | ▲ 1674 Forte+3 in · +2% |
| Operating Weight | 18,500lb | 14,374lb | ▲ DT160+4,126 lb · +29% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | AGCO DT160 | Ursus 1674 Forte | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed center pressure flow compensated (PFC) | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Power | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | AGCO DT160 | Ursus 1674 Forte | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Independent | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 1 | 540rpm | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 2 | 1,000rpm | Not recorded | — |
Tires
| Spec | AGCO DT160 | Ursus 1674 Forte | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | Not recorded | 14.9R28 | — |
| Rear Tire Size | Not recorded | 20.8R38 | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | AGCO DT160 | Ursus 1674 Forte | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-point | Category 3 | — |
| Hitch Category | III/IIIN | III | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Capacity | 16,000lb | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | AGCO DT160 | Ursus 1674 Forte | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Power | — |
| Brake Type | Hydraulic wet disc | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | AGCO DT160 | Ursus 1674 Forte | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | AGCO DT160 | Ursus 1674 Forte | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Cab | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 138 hpA · 62nd percentile (160 hp)B · 60th percentile (156 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 391 ciA · 89th percentile (505 ci)B · 52nd percentile (402 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 61st percentile (18)B · 50th percentile (16)
Operating Weight
median 12,307 lbA · 80th percentile (18,500 lb)B · 63rd percentile (14,374 lb)
A · DT160B · 1674 ForteMedian Row Crop Tractor