Image not recorded
Head to head · Row Crop
AGCO DT200 vs AGCO RT95
AGCOModel B
AGCO RT95
Row Crop
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 359 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 32
AGCOAGCO DT200
vs
AGCOAGCO RT95
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop
Engine Displacement
▲ DT200 higher · +146 ci (+41%)DT200505 ci
RT95359 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci
DT200 is in the 89th percentile; RT95 is in the 41st · 1,409 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedDT2006
RT956
Median Row Crop Tractor6
DT200 is in the 50th percentile; RT95 is in the 50th · 1,417 models
Forward Gears
▲ RT95 higher · +14 (+78%)DT20018
RT9532
Median Row Crop Tractor16
DT200 is in the 61st percentile; RT95 is in the 91st · 1,200 models
Operating Weight
▲ DT200 higher · +8,585 lb (+77%)DT20019,700 lb
RT9511,115 lb
Median Row Crop Tractor12,307 lb
DT200 is in the 84th percentile; RT95 is in the 40th · 1,350 models
DT200 (A)RT95 (B)Median Row Crop Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | AGCO DT200 | AGCO RT95 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AGCO | AGCO | Same |
| Model | DT200 | RT95 | — |
| Category | Row Crop | Row Crop | Same |
Engine
| Spec | AGCO DT200 | AGCO RT95 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Cummins | Cummins | Same |
| Model | C8.3 | B5.9T | — |
| Power Output | 235hp | Not recorded | — |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,200RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 505ci | 359ci | ▲ DT200+146 ci · +41% |
| Bore | 4.5in | 4in | ▲ DT200+0.5 in · +13% |
| Stroke | 5.3in | 4.7in | ▲ DT200+0.6 in · +13% |
Transmission
| Spec | AGCO DT200 | AGCO RT95 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full Power Shift | Partial power shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | AGCO DT200 | AGCO RT95 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 203in | 173in | ▲ DT200+30 in · +17% |
| Width | 98in | 88in | ▲ DT200+10 in · +11% |
| Height | 121in | 109in | ▲ DT200+12 in · +11% |
| Operating Weight | 19,700lb | 11,115lb | ▲ DT200+8,585 lb · +77% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | AGCO DT200 | AGCO RT95 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed Center Pressure Flow Compensated (PFC) | Closed center | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Hydrostatic power | Same |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | AGCO DT200 | AGCO RT95 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Independent | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 1 | 1,000rpm | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | AGCO DT200 | AGCO RT95 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | Category 3/3N | II | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Capacity | 19,000lb | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | AGCO DT200 | AGCO RT95 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Hydrostatic power | Same |
| Brake Type | Hydraulic Wet Disc | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | AGCO DT200 | AGCO RT95 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Voltage | Not recorded | 12V | — |
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | AGCO DT200 | AGCO RT95 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Cab Standard | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Displacement
median 391 ciA · 89th percentile (505 ci)B · 41st percentile (359 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 61st percentile (18)B · 91st percentile (32)
Operating Weight
median 12,307 lbA · 84th percentile (19,700 lb)B · 40th percentile (11,115 lb)
Length
median 180 inA · 77th percentile (203 in)B · 40th percentile (173 in)
A · DT200B · RT95Median Row Crop Tractor