Image not recorded
Head to head · Row Crop
AGCO DT200 vs Fendt 724
Image not recorded
FendtModel B
Fendt 724
Agricultural
- power
- 240 hp
- displacement
- 44 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
AGCOAGCO DT200
vs
FendtFendt 724
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop
Engine Power
▲ 724 higher · +5 hp (+2%)DT200235 hp
724240 hp
Median Row Crop Tractor138 hp
DT200 is in the 85th percentile; 724 is in the 86th · 1,206 models
Engine Displacement
▲ DT200 higher · +461 ci (+1048%)DT200505 ci
72444 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci
DT200 is in the 89th percentile; 724 is in the 1st · 1,409 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedDT2006
7246
Median Row Crop Tractor6
DT200 is in the 50th percentile; 724 is in the 50th · 1,417 models
Operating Weight
▲ DT200 higher · +4,301 lb (+28%)DT20019,700 lb
72415,399 lb
Median Row Crop Tractor12,307 lb
DT200 is in the 84th percentile; 724 is in the 68th · 1,350 models
DT200 (A)724 (B)Median Row Crop Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | AGCO DT200 | Fendt 724 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AGCO | Fendt | — |
| Model | DT200 | 724 | — |
| Category | Row Crop | Agricultural | — |
Engine
| Spec | AGCO DT200 | Fendt 724 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Cummins | Not recorded | — |
| Model | C8.3 | 724 | — |
| Power Output | 235hp | 240hp | ▲ 724+5 hp · +2% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 1,800RPM | ▲ DT200+400 RPM · +22% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 505ci | 44ci | ▲ DT200+461 ci · +1048% |
| Bore | 4.5in | 4in | ▲ DT200+0.5 in · +13% |
| Stroke | 5.3in | 5in | ▲ DT200+0.3 in · +6% |
Transmission
| Spec | AGCO DT200 | Fendt 724 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full Power Shift | Not recorded | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | AGCO DT200 | Fendt 724 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 203in | 206in | ▲ 724+3 in · +1% |
| Width | 98in | 101in | ▲ 724+3 in · +3% |
| Height | 121in | 120in | ▲ DT200+1 in · <1% |
| Operating Weight | 19,700lb | 15,399lb | ▲ DT200+4,301 lb · +28% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | AGCO DT200 | Fendt 724 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed Center Pressure Flow Compensated (PFC) | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Not recorded | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | AGCO DT200 | Fendt 724 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Independent | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 1 | 1,000rpm | 540rpm | ▲ DT200+460 rpm · +85% |
| Speed 2 | Not recorded | 1,000rpm | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | AGCO DT200 | Fendt 724 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | Category 3/3N | Category 3 | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Capacity | 19,000lb | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | AGCO DT200 | Fendt 724 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Not recorded | — |
| Brake Type | Hydraulic Wet Disc | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | AGCO DT200 | Fendt 724 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | AGCO DT200 | Fendt 724 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Cab Standard | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 138 hpA · 85th percentile (235 hp)B · 86th percentile (240 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 391 ciA · 89th percentile (505 ci)B · 1st percentile (44 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)
Operating Weight
median 12,307 lbA · 84th percentile (19,700 lb)B · 68th percentile (15,399 lb)
Length
median 180 inA · 77th percentile (203 in)B · 82nd percentile (206 in)
A · DT200B · 724Median Row Crop Tractor