Image not recorded
Head to head · Row Crop
AGCO DT200 vs Ford 8970
AGCOAGCO DT200
vs
FordFord 8970
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop
Engine Power
▲ 8970 higher · +5 hp (+2%)DT200235 hp
8970240 hp
Median Row Crop Tractor138 hp
DT200 is in the 85th percentile; 8970 is in the 86th · 1,206 models
Engine Displacement
▲ DT200 higher · +49 ci (+11%)DT200505 ci
8970456 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci
DT200 is in the 89th percentile; 8970 is in the 80th · 1,409 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedDT2006
89706
Median Row Crop Tractor6
DT200 is in the 50th percentile; 8970 is in the 50th · 1,417 models
Forward Gears
▲ DT200 higher · +2 (+13%)DT20018
897016
Median Row Crop Tractor16
DT200 is in the 61st percentile; 8970 is in the 50th · 1,200 models
DT200 (A)8970 (B)Median Row Crop Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | AGCO DT200 | Ford 8970 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AGCO | Ford | — |
| Model | DT200 | 8970 | — |
| Category | Row Crop | Row Crop | Same |
Engine
| Spec | AGCO DT200 | Ford 8970 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Cummins | Ford | — |
| Model | C8.3 | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 235hp | 240hp | ▲ 8970+5 hp · +2% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,100RPM | ▲ DT200+100 RPM · +5% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 505ci | 456ci | ▲ DT200+49 ci · +11% |
| Bore | 4.5in | 4.4in | ▲ DT200+0.1 in · +2% |
| Stroke | 5.3in | 5in | ▲ DT200+0.3 in · +6% |
Transmission
| Spec | AGCO DT200 | Ford 8970 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full Power Shift | Full power shift | Same |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | AGCO DT200 | Ford 8970 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 203in | 197in | ▲ DT200+6 in · +3% |
| Width | 98in | 96.7in | ▲ DT200+1.3 in · +1% |
| Height | 121in | 121in | Same |
| Operating Weight | 19,700lb | 16,950lb | ▲ DT200+2,750 lb · +16% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | AGCO DT200 | Ford 8970 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed Center Pressure Flow Compensated (PFC) | Closed center load sensing (CCLS) | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Hydrostatic power | Same |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | AGCO DT200 | Ford 8970 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Independent | Independent | Same |
| Speed 1 | 1,000rpm | 1,000rpm | Same |
Tires
| Spec | AGCO DT200 | Ford 8970 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rear Tire Size | Not recorded | 18.4R42 | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | AGCO DT200 | Ford 8970 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Three-Point Hitch | Same |
| Hitch Category | Category 3/3N | III | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
| Hitch Capacity | 19,000lb | 15,000lb | ▲ DT200+4,000 lb · +27% |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | AGCO DT200 | Ford 8970 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Hydrostatic power | Same |
| Brake Type | Hydraulic Wet Disc | Wet disc | — |
Electrical
| Spec | AGCO DT200 | Ford 8970 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | AGCO DT200 | Ford 8970 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 6.6gal | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | AGCO DT200 | Ford 8970 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Cab Standard | Cab | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 138 hpA · 85th percentile (235 hp)B · 86th percentile (240 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 391 ciA · 89th percentile (505 ci)B · 80th percentile (456 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 61st percentile (18)B · 50th percentile (16)
Operating Weight
median 12,307 lbA · 84th percentile (19,700 lb)B · 73rd percentile (16,950 lb)
A · DT200B · 8970Median Row Crop Tractor