Image not recorded
Head to head · Row Crop
AGCO DT200 vs Renault Atles 926

RenaultModel B
Renault Atles 926
Four-Wheel Drive
- power
- 240 hp
- displacement
- 436 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 18
AGCOAGCO DT200
vs
RenaultRenault Atles 926
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop
Engine Power
▲ Atles 926 higher · +5 hp (+2%)DT200235 hp
Atles 926240 hp
Median Row Crop Tractor138 hp
DT200 is in the 85th percentile; Atles 926 is in the 86th · 1,206 models
Engine Displacement
▲ DT200 higher · +69 ci (+16%)DT200505 ci
Atles 926436 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci
DT200 is in the 89th percentile; Atles 926 is in the 75th · 1,409 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedDT2006
Atles 9266
Median Row Crop Tractor6
DT200 is in the 50th percentile; Atles 926 is in the 50th · 1,417 models
Forward Gears
= Effectively tiedDT20018
Atles 92618
Median Row Crop Tractor16
DT200 is in the 61st percentile; Atles 926 is in the 61st · 1,200 models
DT200 (A)Atles 926 (B)Median Row Crop Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | AGCO DT200 | Renault Atles 926 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AGCO | Renault | — |
| Model | DT200 | Atles 926 | — |
| Category | Row Crop | Four-Wheel Drive | — |
Engine
| Spec | AGCO DT200 | Renault Atles 926 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Cummins | Deutz | — |
| Model | C8.3 | BF6L1013FC | — |
| Power Output | 235hp | 240hp | ▲ Atles 926+5 hp · +2% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 1,800RPM | ▲ DT200+400 RPM · +22% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 505ci | 436ci | ▲ DT200+69 ci · +16% |
| Bore | 4.5in | 4.3in | ▲ DT200+0.2 in · +5% |
| Stroke | 5.3in | 5.1in | ▲ DT200+0.2 in · +4% |
Transmission
| Spec | AGCO DT200 | Renault Atles 926 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full Power Shift | Not recorded | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | AGCO DT200 | Renault Atles 926 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 203in | 198in | ▲ DT200+5 in · +3% |
| Width | 98in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 121in | 126in | ▲ Atles 926+5 in · +4% |
| Operating Weight | 19,700lb | 21,300lb | ▲ Atles 926+1,600 lb · +8% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | AGCO DT200 | Renault Atles 926 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed Center Pressure Flow Compensated (PFC) | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Hydrostatic Power | Same |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | AGCO DT200 | Renault Atles 926 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Independent | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 1 | 1,000rpm | Not recorded | — |
Tires
| Spec | AGCO DT200 | Renault Atles 926 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | Not recorded | 16.9R30 | — |
| Rear Tire Size | Not recorded | 20.8R42 | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | AGCO DT200 | Renault Atles 926 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | Category 3/3N | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Capacity | 19,000lb | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | AGCO DT200 | Renault Atles 926 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Hydrostatic Power | Same |
| Brake Type | Hydraulic Wet Disc | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | AGCO DT200 | Renault Atles 926 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | AGCO DT200 | Renault Atles 926 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Cab Standard | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 138 hpA · 85th percentile (235 hp)B · 86th percentile (240 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 391 ciA · 89th percentile (505 ci)B · 75th percentile (436 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 61st percentile (18)B · 61st percentile (18)
Operating Weight
median 12,307 lbA · 84th percentile (19,700 lb)B · 87th percentile (21,300 lb)
A · DT200B · Atles 926Median Row Crop Tractor