Image not recorded
Head to head · Row Crop
AGCO DT200 vs Valmet 6250
Image not recorded
ValmetModel B
Valmet 6250
Row Crop
- power
- 79.1 hp
- displacement
- 268 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 36
AGCOAGCO DT200
vs
ValmetValmet 6250
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop
Engine Power
▲ DT200 higher · +156 hp (+197%)DT200235 hp
625079.1 hp
Median Row Crop Tractor138 hp
DT200 is in the 85th percentile; 6250 is in the 13th · 1,206 models
Engine Displacement
▲ DT200 higher · +237 ci (+88%)DT200505 ci
6250268 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci
DT200 is in the 89th percentile; 6250 is in the 21st · 1,409 models
Cylinders
▲ DT200 higher · +2 (+50%)DT2006
62504
Median Row Crop Tractor6
DT200 is in the 50th percentile; 6250 is in the 17th · 1,417 models
Forward Gears
▲ 6250 higher · +18 (+100%)DT20018
625036
Median Row Crop Tractor16
DT200 is in the 61st percentile; 6250 is in the 95th · 1,200 models
DT200 (A)6250 (B)Median Row Crop Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | AGCO DT200 | Valmet 6250 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AGCO | Valmet | — |
| Model | DT200 | 6250 | — |
| Category | Row Crop | Row Crop | Same |
Engine
| Spec | AGCO DT200 | Valmet 6250 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Cummins | Valmet | — |
| Model | C8.3 | 420 DSRE | — |
| Power Output | 235hp | 79.1hp | ▲ DT200+156 hp · +197% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,200RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 6 | 4 | ▲ DT200+2 · +50% |
| Displacement | 505ci | 268ci | ▲ DT200+237 ci · +88% |
| Bore | 4.5in | 4.3in | ▲ DT200+0.2 in · +5% |
| Stroke | 5.3in | 4.7in | ▲ DT200+0.6 in · +13% |
Transmission
| Spec | AGCO DT200 | Valmet 6250 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full Power Shift | Three-speed power shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | AGCO DT200 | Valmet 6250 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 203in | 176in | ▲ DT200+27 in · +15% |
| Width | 98in | 85.8in | ▲ DT200+12.2 in · +14% |
| Height | 121in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 19,700lb | 9,700lb | ▲ DT200+10,000 lb · +103% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | AGCO DT200 | Valmet 6250 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed Center Pressure Flow Compensated (PFC) | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Power | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | AGCO DT200 | Valmet 6250 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Independent | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 1 | 1,000rpm | Not recorded | — |
Tires
| Spec | AGCO DT200 | Valmet 6250 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | Not recorded | 13.6R28 | — |
| Rear Tire Size | Not recorded | 16.9R38 | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | AGCO DT200 | Valmet 6250 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Category 2 | — |
| Hitch Category | Category 3/3N | II | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
| Hitch Capacity | 19,000lb | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | AGCO DT200 | Valmet 6250 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Four-wheel drive (4WD) | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Power | — |
| Brake Type | Hydraulic Wet Disc | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | AGCO DT200 | Valmet 6250 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | AGCO DT200 | Valmet 6250 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Cab Standard | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 138 hpA · 85th percentile (235 hp)B · 13th percentile (79.1 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 391 ciA · 89th percentile (505 ci)B · 21st percentile (268 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 17th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 61st percentile (18)B · 95th percentile (36)
Operating Weight
median 12,307 lbA · 84th percentile (19,700 lb)B · 29th percentile (9,700 lb)
A · DT200B · 6250Median Row Crop Tractor