Image not recorded
Head to head · Row Crop
AGCO DT200 vs XTZ XTZ-240K
XTZModel B
XTZ XTZ-240K
Utility
- power
- 240 hp
- displacement
- 907 ci
- Cylinders
- 8
- Forward gears
- 16
AGCOAGCO DT200
vs
XTZXTZ XTZ-240K
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop
Engine Power
▲ XTZ-240K higher · +5 hp (+2%)DT200235 hp
XTZ-240K240 hp
Median Row Crop Tractor138 hp
DT200 is in the 85th percentile; XTZ-240K is in the 86th · 1,206 models
Engine Displacement
▲ XTZ-240K higher · +402 ci (+80%)DT200505 ci
XTZ-240K907 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci
DT200 is in the 89th percentile; XTZ-240K is in the 99th · 1,409 models
Cylinders
▲ XTZ-240K higher · +2 (+33%)DT2006
XTZ-240K8
Median Row Crop Tractor6
DT200 is in the 50th percentile; XTZ-240K is in the 99th · 1,417 models
Forward Gears
▲ DT200 higher · +2 (+13%)DT20018
XTZ-240K16
Median Row Crop Tractor16
DT200 is in the 61st percentile; XTZ-240K is in the 50th · 1,200 models
DT200 (A)XTZ-240K (B)Median Row Crop Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | AGCO DT200 | XTZ XTZ-240K | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AGCO | XTZ | — |
| Model | DT200 | XTZ-240K | — |
| Category | Row Crop | Utility | — |
Engine
| Spec | AGCO DT200 | XTZ XTZ-240K | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Cummins | YaMZ | — |
| Model | C8.3 | YaMZ 14.9L 8-cyl diesel | — |
| Power Output | 235hp | 240hp | ▲ XTZ-240K+5 hp · +2% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | Not recorded | — |
| Cylinders | 6 | 8 | ▲ XTZ-240K+2 · +33% |
| Displacement | 505ci | 907ci | ▲ XTZ-240K+402 ci · +80% |
| Bore | 4.5in | 5.1in | ▲ XTZ-240K+0.6 in · +13% |
| Stroke | 5.3in | 5.5in | ▲ XTZ-240K+0.2 in · +4% |
Transmission
| Spec | AGCO DT200 | XTZ XTZ-240K | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full Power Shift | Manual | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | AGCO DT200 | XTZ XTZ-240K | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 203in | 252in | ▲ XTZ-240K+49 in · +24% |
| Width | 98in | 96.9in | ▲ DT200+1.1 in · +1% |
| Height | 121in | 136in | ▲ XTZ-240K+15 in · +12% |
| Operating Weight | 19,700lb | 18,450lb | ▲ DT200+1,250 lb · +7% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | AGCO DT200 | XTZ XTZ-240K | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed Center Pressure Flow Compensated (PFC) | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Articulated Power | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | AGCO DT200 | XTZ XTZ-240K | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Independent | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 1 | 1,000rpm | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | AGCO DT200 | XTZ XTZ-240K | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | Category 3/3N | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Capacity | 19,000lb | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | AGCO DT200 | XTZ XTZ-240K | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x4 Articulated 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Articulated Power | — |
| Brake Type | Hydraulic Wet Disc | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | AGCO DT200 | XTZ XTZ-240K | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | AGCO DT200 | XTZ XTZ-240K | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Cab Standard | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 138 hpA · 85th percentile (235 hp)B · 86th percentile (240 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 391 ciA · 89th percentile (505 ci)B · 99th percentile (907 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 99th percentile (8)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 61st percentile (18)B · 50th percentile (16)
Operating Weight
median 12,307 lbA · 84th percentile (19,700 lb)B · 79th percentile (18,450 lb)
A · DT200B · XTZ-240KMedian Row Crop Tractor