Image not recorded
AGCOModel A
AGCO DT275B
Row Crop
- power
- 317 hp
- displacement
- 513 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Row Crop
AGCO DT275B vs Challenger 75
Image not recorded
ChallengerModel B
Challenger 75
Articulated
- power
- 325 hp
- displacement
- 629 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 10
AGCOAGCO DT275B
vs
ChallengerChallenger 75
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop
Engine Power
▲ 75 higher · +8 hp (+3%)DT275B317 hp
75325 hp
Median Row Crop Tractor138 hp
DT275B is in the 95th percentile; 75 is in the 95th · 1,206 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 75 higher · +116 ci (+23%)DT275B513 ci
75629 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci
DT275B is in the 92nd percentile; 75 is in the 98th · 1,409 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedDT275B6
756
Median Row Crop Tractor6
DT275B is in the 50th percentile; 75 is in the 50th · 1,417 models
Operating Weight
▲ 75 higher · +8,530 lb (+33%)DT275B25,840 lb
7534,370 lb
Median Row Crop Tractor12,307 lb
DT275B is in the 95th percentile; 75 is in the 99th · 1,350 models
DT275B (A)75 (B)Median Row Crop Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | AGCO DT275B | Challenger 75 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AGCO | Challenger | — |
| Model | DT275B | 75 | — |
| Category | Row Crop | Articulated | — |
Engine
| Spec | AGCO DT275B | Challenger 75 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Sisu Diesel | Caterpillar | — |
| Model | Sisu Diesel 84CTA | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 317hp | 325hp | ▲ 75+8 hp · +3% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,100RPM | ▲ DT275B+100 RPM · +5% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 513ci | 629ci | ▲ 75+116 ci · +23% |
| Bore | 4.4in | 4.9in | ▲ 75+0.5 in · +11% |
| Stroke | 5.7in | 5.5in | ▲ DT275B+0.2 in · +4% |
Transmission
| Spec | AGCO DT275B | Challenger 75 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Continuously variable transmission (CVT) with two mechanical ranges | Full Power Shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | AGCO DT275B | Challenger 75 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 216in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 141in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 25,840lb | 34,370lb | ▲ 75+8,530 lb · +33% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | AGCO DT275B | Challenger 75 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed center pressure flow compensated (PFC) | Closed | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Hydrostatic Differential Steering | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | AGCO DT275B | Challenger 75 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Optional Transmission or Live PTO | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 1 | 540rpm | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 2 | 1,000rpm | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | AGCO DT275B | Challenger 75 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | 3-Point Hitch | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | Category III, Category IV | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Capacity | 26,460lb | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | AGCO DT275B | Challenger 75 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Hydrostatic Differential Steering | — |
| Brake Type | Hydraulic wet disc | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | AGCO DT275B | Challenger 75 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric Starter | — |
Capacities
| Spec | AGCO DT275B | Challenger 75 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 11gal | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | AGCO DT275B | Challenger 75 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Cab | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 138 hpA · 95th percentile (317 hp)B · 95th percentile (325 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 391 ciA · 92nd percentile (513 ci)B · 98th percentile (629 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)
Operating Weight
median 12,307 lbA · 95th percentile (25,840 lb)B · 99th percentile (34,370 lb)
A · DT275BB · 75Median Row Crop Tractor