Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
AGCO GT45 vs Ursus C-350
AGCOAGCO GT45
vs
UrsusUrsus C-350
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ GT45 higher · +2 hp (+4%)GT4552 hp
C-35050 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
GT45 is in the 47th percentile; C-350 is in the 45th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ C-350 higher · +7 ci (+4%)GT45183 ci
C-350190 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
GT45 is in the 50th percentile; C-350 is in the 51st · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ C-350 higher · +1 (+33%)GT453
C-3504
Median Utility Tractor4
GT45 is in the 23rd percentile; C-350 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ GT45 higher · +6 (+60%)GT4516
C-35010
Median Utility Tractor12
GT45 is in the 73rd percentile; C-350 is in the 39th · 4,941 models
GT45 (A)C-350 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | AGCO GT45 | Ursus C-350 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AGCO | Ursus | — |
| Model | GT45 | C-350 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | AGCO GT45 | Ursus C-350 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | SAME Deutz-Fahr | Ursus | — |
| Model | Not recorded | S-4001 | — |
| Power Output | 52hp | 50hp | ▲ GT45+2 hp · +4% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,000RPM | ▲ GT45+200 RPM · +10% |
| Cylinders | 3 | 4 | ▲ C-350+1 · +33% |
| Displacement | 183ci | 190ci | ▲ C-350+7 ci · +4% |
| Bore | 4.1in | 3.7in | ▲ GT45+0.4 in · +11% |
| Stroke | 4.5in | 4.3in | ▲ GT45+0.2 in · +5% |
Transmission
| Spec | AGCO GT45 | Ursus C-350 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Synchro-shuttle | Manual | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | AGCO GT45 | Ursus C-350 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 146in | 128in | ▲ GT45+18 in · +14% |
| Width | 70.4in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 104in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 4,806lb | 4,829lb | ▲ C-350+23 lb · <1% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | AGCO GT45 | Ursus C-350 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open Center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | AGCO GT45 | Ursus C-350 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | II | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | AGCO GT45 | Ursus C-350 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x2 | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 2WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Power | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | AGCO GT45 | Ursus C-350 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric Starter | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | AGCO GT45 | Ursus C-350 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | ROPS | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 47th percentile (52 hp)B · 45th percentile (50 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 50th percentile (183 ci)B · 51st percentile (190 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 73rd percentile (16)B · 39th percentile (10)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 46th percentile (4,806 lb)B · 46th percentile (4,829 lb)
A · GT45B · C-350Median Utility Tractor