
Head to head · Utility
AGCO GT55 vs LS XR60

Image not recorded
AGCOAGCO GT55
vs
LSLS XR60
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ GT55 higher · +0.2 hp (<1%)GT5556 hp
XR6055.8 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
GT55 is in the 51st percentile; XR60 is in the 50th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ GT55 higher · +30 ci (+20%)GT55183 ci
XR60153 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
GT55 is in the 50th percentile; XR60 is in the 40th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ XR60 higher · +1 (+33%)GT553
XR604
Median Utility Tractor4
GT55 is in the 23rd percentile; XR60 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
= Effectively tiedGT5516
XR6016
Median Utility Tractor12
GT55 is in the 73rd percentile; XR60 is in the 73rd · 4,941 models
GT55 (A)XR60 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | AGCO GT55 | LS XR60 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AGCO | LS | — |
| Model | GT55 | XR60 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | AGCO GT55 | LS XR60 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | SAME Deutz-Fahr | LS | — |
| Model | Not recorded | S4QLT | — |
| Power Output | 56hp | 55.8hp | ▲ GT55+0.2 hp · <1% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,600RPM | ▲ XR60+400 RPM · +18% |
| Cylinders | 3 | 4 | ▲ XR60+1 · +33% |
| Displacement | 183ci | 153ci | ▲ GT55+30 ci · +20% |
| Bore | 4.1in | 3.5in | ▲ GT55+0.6 in · +17% |
| Stroke | 4.5in | 4.1in | ▲ GT55+0.4 in · +10% |
Transmission
| Spec | AGCO GT55 | LS XR60 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Synchro-shuttle | Synchronized shuttle | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | AGCO GT55 | LS XR60 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 146in | 129in | ▲ GT55+17 in · +13% |
| Width | 70.4in | 62.4in | ▲ GT55+8 in · +13% |
| Height | 105in | 91.1in | ▲ GT55+13.9 in · +15% |
| Operating Weight | 6,225lb | 4,334lb | ▲ GT55+1,891 lb · +44% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | AGCO GT55 | LS XR60 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power steering | Hydrostatic power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | AGCO GT55 | LS XR60 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | II | I | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | AGCO GT55 | LS XR60 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Power steering | Hydrostatic power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | AGCO GT55 | LS XR60 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Voltage | 12V | Not recorded | — |
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | AGCO GT55 | LS XR60 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | ROPS | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 51st percentile (56 hp)B · 50th percentile (55.8 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 50th percentile (183 ci)B · 40th percentile (153 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 73rd percentile (16)B · 73rd percentile (16)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 59th percentile (6,225 lb)B · 41st percentile (4,334 lb)
A · GT55B · XR60Median Utility Tractor