Head to head · Utility
AGCO GT55 vs Massey Ferguson 264
Image not recorded
Massey FergusonModel B
Massey Ferguson 264
Utility
- power
- 56 hp
- displacement
- 153 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 12
AGCOAGCO GT55
vs
Massey FergusonMassey Ferguson 264
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
= Effectively tiedGT5556 hp
26456 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
GT55 is in the 51st percentile; 264 is in the 51st · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ GT55 higher · +30 ci (+20%)GT55183 ci
264153 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
GT55 is in the 50th percentile; 264 is in the 40th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedGT553
2643
Median Utility Tractor4
GT55 is in the 23rd percentile; 264 is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ GT55 higher · +4 (+33%)GT5516
26412
Median Utility Tractor12
GT55 is in the 73rd percentile; 264 is in the 50th · 4,941 models
GT55 (A)264 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | AGCO GT55 | Massey Ferguson 264 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AGCO | Massey Ferguson | — |
| Model | GT55 | 264 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | AGCO GT55 | Massey Ferguson 264 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | SAME Deutz-Fahr | Perkins | — |
| Model | Not recorded | AT 3.152 | — |
| Power Output | 56hp | 56hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,200RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 3 | 3 | Same |
| Displacement | 183ci | 153ci | ▲ GT55+30 ci · +20% |
| Bore | 4.1in | 3.6in | ▲ GT55+0.5 in · +14% |
| Stroke | 4.5in | 5in | ▲ 264+0.5 in · +11% |
Transmission
| Spec | AGCO GT55 | Massey Ferguson 264 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Synchro-shuttle | Not recorded | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | AGCO GT55 | Massey Ferguson 264 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 146in | Not recorded | — |
| Width | 70.4in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 105in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 6,225lb | Not recorded | — |
Hydraulics
| Spec | AGCO GT55 | Massey Ferguson 264 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power steering | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | AGCO GT55 | Massey Ferguson 264 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | II | III | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | AGCO GT55 | Massey Ferguson 264 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x2 2WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 2WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Power steering | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | AGCO GT55 | Massey Ferguson 264 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Voltage | 12V | Not recorded | — |
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | AGCO GT55 | Massey Ferguson 264 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | ROPS | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 51st percentile (56 hp)B · 51st percentile (56 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 50th percentile (183 ci)B · 40th percentile (153 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 73rd percentile (16)B · 50th percentile (12)
A · GT55B · 264Median Utility Tractor