Head to head · Utility
AGCO GT55 vs Minneapolis-Moline Jet Star
Image not recorded
Minneapolis-MolineModel B
Minneapolis-Moline Jet Star
Utility
- power
- 56 hp
- displacement
- 206 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 5
AGCOAGCO GT55
vs
Minneapolis-MolineMinneapolis-Moline Jet Star
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
= Effectively tiedGT5556 hp
Jet Star56 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
GT55 is in the 51st percentile; Jet Star is in the 51st · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ Jet Star higher · +23 ci (+13%)GT55183 ci
Jet Star206 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
GT55 is in the 50th percentile; Jet Star is in the 57th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ Jet Star higher · +1 (+33%)GT553
Jet Star4
Median Utility Tractor4
GT55 is in the 23rd percentile; Jet Star is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ GT55 higher · +11 (+220%)GT5516
Jet Star5
Median Utility Tractor12
GT55 is in the 73rd percentile; Jet Star is in the 6th · 4,941 models
GT55 (A)Jet Star (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | AGCO GT55 | Minneapolis-Moline Jet Star | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AGCO | Minneapolis-Moline | — |
| Model | GT55 | Jet Star | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | AGCO GT55 | Minneapolis-Moline Jet Star | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | SAME Deutz-Fahr | Minneapolis-Moline | — |
| Model | Not recorded | 3.4L 4-cyl | — |
| Power Output | 56hp | 56hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 1,750RPM | ▲ GT55+450 RPM · +26% |
| Cylinders | 3 | 4 | ▲ Jet Star+1 · +33% |
| Displacement | 183ci | 206ci | ▲ Jet Star+23 ci · +13% |
| Bore | 4.1in | 3.6in | ▲ GT55+0.5 in · +14% |
| Stroke | 4.5in | 5in | ▲ Jet Star+0.5 in · +11% |
Transmission
| Spec | AGCO GT55 | Minneapolis-Moline Jet Star | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Synchro-shuttle | Gear | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | AGCO GT55 | Minneapolis-Moline Jet Star | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 146in | 125in | ▲ GT55+21 in · +17% |
| Width | 70.4in | 70.3in | ▲ GT55+0.1 in · <1% |
| Height | 105in | 77.5in | ▲ GT55+27.5 in · +35% |
| Operating Weight | 6,225lb | 3,604lb | ▲ GT55+2,621 lb · +73% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | AGCO GT55 | Minneapolis-Moline Jet Star | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power steering | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | AGCO GT55 | Minneapolis-Moline Jet Star | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | II | II | Same |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | AGCO GT55 | Minneapolis-Moline Jet Star | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power steering | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | AGCO GT55 | Minneapolis-Moline Jet Star | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Voltage | 12V | Not recorded | — |
| Starter Type | Electric | Not recorded | — |
Capacities
| Spec | AGCO GT55 | Minneapolis-Moline Jet Star | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 3.4gal | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | AGCO GT55 | Minneapolis-Moline Jet Star | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | ROPS | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 51st percentile (56 hp)B · 51st percentile (56 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 50th percentile (183 ci)B · 57th percentile (206 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 73rd percentile (16)B · 6th percentile (5)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 59th percentile (6,225 lb)B · 31st percentile (3,604 lb)
A · GT55B · Jet StarMedian Utility Tractor