Image not recorded
AGCOModel A
AGCO GT55A
Utility
- power
- 58.9 hp
- displacement
- 183 ci
- Cylinders
- Not recorded
- Forward gears
- 16
Head to head · Utility
AGCO GT55A vs Fendt Farmer 260S
Image not recorded
FendtModel B
Fendt Farmer 260S
Row Crop
- power
- 59 hp
- displacement
- 187 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 21
AGCOAGCO GT55A
vs
FendtFendt Farmer 260S
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ Farmer 260S higher · +0.1 hp (<1%)GT55A58.9 hp
Farmer 260S59 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
GT55A is in the 52nd percentile; Farmer 260S is in the 53rd · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ Farmer 260S higher · +4 ci (+2%)GT55A183 ci
Farmer 260S187 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
GT55A is in the 50th percentile; Farmer 260S is in the 50th · 5,580 models
Forward Gears
▲ Farmer 260S higher · +5 (+31%)GT55A16
Farmer 260S21
Median Utility Tractor12
GT55A is in the 73rd percentile; Farmer 260S is in the 88th · 4,941 models
Operating Weight
▲ GT55A higher · +844 lb (+15%)GT55A6,400 lb
Farmer 260S5,556 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
GT55A is in the 61st percentile; Farmer 260S is in the 52nd · 5,107 models
GT55A (A)Farmer 260S (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | AGCO GT55A | Fendt Farmer 260S | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AGCO | Fendt | — |
| Model | GT55A | Farmer 260S | — |
| Category | Utility | Row Crop | — |
Engine
| Spec | AGCO GT55A | Fendt Farmer 260S | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Not recorded | KHD | — |
| Model | Not recorded | F3L913 | — |
| Power Output | 58.9hp | 59hp | ▲ Farmer 260S+0.1 hp · <1% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,400RPM | ▲ Farmer 260S+200 RPM · +9% |
| Cylinders | Not recorded | 3 | — |
| Displacement | 183ci | 187ci | ▲ Farmer 260S+4 ci · +2% |
| Bore | Not recorded | 4in | — |
| Stroke | Not recorded | 4.9in | — |
Transmission
| Spec | AGCO GT55A | Fendt Farmer 260S | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | 16-speed transmission | Shuttle | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | AGCO GT55A | Fendt Farmer 260S | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 146in | 139in | ▲ GT55A+7 in · +5% |
| Width | 70.8in | 74in | ▲ Farmer 260S+3.2 in · +5% |
| Height | 104in | 91.3in | ▲ GT55A+12.7 in · +14% |
| Operating Weight | 6,400lb | 5,556lb | ▲ GT55A+844 lb · +15% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | AGCO GT55A | Fendt Farmer 260S | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | AGCO GT55A | Fendt Farmer 260S | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Category II | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Capacity | 3,802lb | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | AGCO GT55A | Fendt Farmer 260S | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | AGCO GT55A | Fendt Farmer 260S | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Not recorded | Electric | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | AGCO GT55A | Fendt Farmer 260S | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Cab, ROPS | Cab | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 52nd percentile (58.9 hp)B · 53rd percentile (59 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 50th percentile (183 ci)B · 50th percentile (187 ci)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 73rd percentile (16)B · 88th percentile (21)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 61st percentile (6,400 lb)B · 52nd percentile (5,556 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 62nd percentile (146 in)B · 54th percentile (139 in)
A · GT55AB · Farmer 260SMedian Utility Tractor