Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
AGCO GT65 vs Massey Ferguson 435
Massey FergusonModel B
Massey Ferguson 435
Utility
- power
- 72 hp
- displacement
- 244 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 12
AGCOAGCO GT65
vs
Massey FergusonMassey Ferguson 435
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ 435 higher · +1 hp (+1%)GT6571 hp
43572 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
GT65 is in the 64th percentile; 435 is in the 65th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
= Effectively tiedGT65244 ci
435244 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
GT65 is in the 68th percentile; 435 is in the 69th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedGT654
4354
Median Utility Tractor4
GT65 is in the 50th percentile; 435 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ GT65 higher · +4 (+33%)GT6516
43512
Median Utility Tractor12
GT65 is in the 73rd percentile; 435 is in the 50th · 4,941 models
GT65 (A)435 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Massey Ferguson 435 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AGCO | Massey Ferguson | — |
| Model | GT65 | 435 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Massey Ferguson 435 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | SAME Deutz-Fahr | Perkins | — |
| Model | Not recorded | P4000 | — |
| Power Output | 71hp | 72hp | ▲ 435+1 hp · +1% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,200RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 244ci | 244ci | Same |
| Bore | 4.1in | 3.9in | ▲ GT65+0.2 in · +5% |
| Stroke | 4.5in | 5in | ▲ 435+0.5 in · +11% |
Transmission
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Massey Ferguson 435 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Synchro-shuttle | Synchromesh | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Massey Ferguson 435 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 152in | 157in | ▲ 435+5 in · +3% |
| Width | 76.7in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 106in | 102in | ▲ GT65+4 in · +4% |
| Operating Weight | 5,335lb | 5,710lb | ▲ 435+375 lb · +7% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Massey Ferguson 435 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Hydrostatic power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Massey Ferguson 435 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | II | Category 2 | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Massey Ferguson 435 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x2 2WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 2WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Power | Hydrostatic power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Massey Ferguson 435 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Massey Ferguson 435 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | ROPS | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 64th percentile (71 hp)B · 65th percentile (72 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 68th percentile (244 ci)B · 69th percentile (244 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 73rd percentile (16)B · 50th percentile (12)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 50th percentile (5,335 lb)B · 54th percentile (5,710 lb)
A · GT65B · 435Median Utility Tractor