Image not recorded
AgcoModel A
Agco GT65A
Utility
- power
- 71 hp
- displacement
- 244 ci
- Cylinders
- Not recorded
- Forward gears
- 20
Head to head · Utility
Agco GT65A vs CaseIH Farmall 80N
CaseIHModel B
CaseIH Farmall 80N
Agricultural
- power
- 74 hp
- displacement
- 207 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 16
AgcoAgco GT65A
vs
CaseIHCaseIH Farmall 80N
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ Farmall 80N higher · +3 hp (+4%)GT65A71 hp
Farmall 80N74 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
GT65A is in the 64th percentile; Farmall 80N is in the 66th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ GT65A higher · +37 ci (+18%)GT65A244 ci
Farmall 80N207 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
GT65A is in the 69th percentile; Farmall 80N is in the 57th · 5,580 models
Forward Gears
▲ GT65A higher · +4 (+25%)GT65A20
Farmall 80N16
Median Utility Tractor12
GT65A is in the 86th percentile; Farmall 80N is in the 73rd · 4,941 models
Operating Weight
▲ GT65A higher · +564 lb (+11%)GT65A5,864 lb
Farmall 80N5,300 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
GT65A is in the 55th percentile; Farmall 80N is in the 50th · 5,107 models
GT65A (A)Farmall 80N (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Agco GT65A | CaseIH Farmall 80N | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Agco | CaseIH | — |
| Model | GT65A | Farmall 80N | — |
| Category | Utility | Agricultural, Orchard/Vineyard | — |
Engine
| Spec | Agco GT65A | CaseIH Farmall 80N | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Not recorded | FPT | — |
| Power Output | 71hp | 74hp | ▲ Farmall 80N+3 hp · +4% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,300RPM | ▲ Farmall 80N+100 RPM · +5% |
| Cylinders | Not recorded | 4 | — |
| Displacement | 244ci | 207ci | ▲ GT65A+37 ci · +18% |
| Bore | Not recorded | 3.9in | — |
| Stroke | Not recorded | 4.3in | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Agco GT65A | CaseIH Farmall 80N | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Synchro-Shuttle | Partially synchronized | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Agco GT65A | CaseIH Farmall 80N | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 152in | 96in | ▲ GT65A+56 in · +58% |
| Width | 76.8in | 52.9in | ▲ GT65A+23.9 in · +45% |
| Height | 107in | 90in | ▲ GT65A+17 in · +19% |
| Operating Weight | 5,864lb | 5,300lb | ▲ GT65A+564 lb · +11% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Agco GT65A | CaseIH Farmall 80N | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Open Center | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Power | — |
Tires
| Spec | Agco GT65A | CaseIH Farmall 80N | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | Not recorded | 6 | — |
| Rear Tire Size | Not recorded | 14.9 | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Agco GT65A | CaseIH Farmall 80N | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Cat II | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Capacity | 3,520lb | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Agco GT65A | CaseIH Farmall 80N | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Power | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Agco GT65A | CaseIH Farmall 80N | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Cab, ROPS | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 64th percentile (71 hp)B · 66th percentile (74 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 69th percentile (244 ci)B · 57th percentile (207 ci)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 86th percentile (20)B · 73rd percentile (16)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 55th percentile (5,864 lb)B · 50th percentile (5,300 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 68th percentile (152 in)B · 7th percentile (96 in)
A · GT65AB · Farmall 80NMedian Utility Tractor