Image not recorded
AgcoModel A
Agco GT65A
Utility
- power
- 71 hp
- displacement
- 244 ci
- Cylinders
- Not recorded
- Forward gears
- 20
Head to head · Utility
Utility
Utility
How they compare
GT65A is in the 64th percentile; AgroPrima 4.31 is in the 68th · 5,383 models
GT65A is in the 69th percentile; AgroPrima 4.31 is in the 70th · 5,580 models
GT65A is in the 86th percentile; AgroPrima 4.31 is in the 83rd · 4,941 models
GT65A is in the 55th percentile; AgroPrima 4.31 is in the 74th · 5,107 models
Full comparison
| Spec | Agco GT65A | Deutz-Fahr AgroPrima 4.31 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Agco | Deutz-Fahr | — |
| Model | GT65A | AgroPrima 4.31 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
| Spec | Agco GT65A | Deutz-Fahr AgroPrima 4.31 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Not recorded | Deutz | — |
| Power Output | 71hp | 75hp | ▲ AgroPrima 4.31+4 hp · +6% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,350RPM | ▲ AgroPrima 4.31+150 RPM · +7% |
| Cylinders | Not recorded | 4 | — |
| Displacement | 244ci | 249ci | ▲ AgroPrima 4.31+5 ci · +2% |
| Bore | Not recorded | 3.9in | — |
| Stroke | Not recorded | 4.8in | — |
| Spec | Agco GT65A | Deutz-Fahr AgroPrima 4.31 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Synchro-Shuttle | Not recorded | — |
| Spec | Agco GT65A | Deutz-Fahr AgroPrima 4.31 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 152in | 159in | ▲ AgroPrima 4.31+7 in · +5% |
| Width | 76.8in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 107in | 103in | ▲ GT65A+4 in · +4% |
| Operating Weight | 5,864lb | 7,783lb | ▲ AgroPrima 4.31+1,919 lb · +33% |
| Spec | Agco GT65A | Deutz-Fahr AgroPrima 4.31 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Cat II | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Capacity | 3,520lb | Not recorded | — |
| Spec | Agco GT65A | Deutz-Fahr AgroPrima 4.31 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | 2WD | — |
| Spec | Agco GT65A | Deutz-Fahr AgroPrima 4.31 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Cab, ROPS | Not recorded | — |
Category context