Image not recorded
AgcoModel A
Agco GT65A
Utility
- power
- 71 hp
- displacement
- 244 ci
- Cylinders
- Not recorded
- Forward gears
- 20
Head to head · Utility
Agco GT65A vs Fendt 370GT
AgcoAgco GT65A
vs
FendtFendt 370GT
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ 370GT higher · +4 hp (+6%)GT65A71 hp
370GT75 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
GT65A is in the 64th percentile; 370GT is in the 68th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 370GT higher · +5 ci (+2%)GT65A244 ci
370GT249 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
GT65A is in the 69th percentile; 370GT is in the 70th · 5,580 models
Forward Gears
▲ 370GT higher · +1 (+5%)GT65A20
370GT21
Median Utility Tractor12
GT65A is in the 86th percentile; 370GT is in the 88th · 4,941 models
Operating Weight
▲ 370GT higher · +2,051 lb (+35%)GT65A5,864 lb
370GT7,915 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
GT65A is in the 55th percentile; 370GT is in the 75th · 5,107 models
GT65A (A)370GT (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Agco GT65A | Fendt 370GT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Agco | Fendt | — |
| Model | GT65A | 370GT | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Agco GT65A | Fendt 370GT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Not recorded | KHD | — |
| Power Output | 71hp | 75hp | ▲ 370GT+4 hp · +6% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,400RPM | ▲ 370GT+200 RPM · +9% |
| Cylinders | Not recorded | 4 | — |
| Displacement | 244ci | 249ci | ▲ 370GT+5 ci · +2% |
| Bore | Not recorded | 4in | — |
| Stroke | Not recorded | 4.9in | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Agco GT65A | Fendt 370GT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Synchro-Shuttle | Manual | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Agco GT65A | Fendt 370GT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 152in | 182in | ▲ 370GT+30 in · +20% |
| Width | 76.8in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 107in | 107in | Same |
| Operating Weight | 5,864lb | 7,915lb | ▲ 370GT+2,051 lb · +35% |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Agco GT65A | Fendt 370GT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Cat II | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Capacity | 3,520lb | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Agco GT65A | Fendt 370GT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | 2WD | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Agco GT65A | Fendt 370GT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Cab, ROPS | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 64th percentile (71 hp)B · 68th percentile (75 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 69th percentile (244 ci)B · 70th percentile (249 ci)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 86th percentile (20)B · 88th percentile (21)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 55th percentile (5,864 lb)B · 75th percentile (7,915 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 68th percentile (152 in)B · 91st percentile (182 in)
A · GT65AB · 370GTMedian Utility Tractor