Image not recorded
AgcoModel A
Agco GT65A
Utility
- power
- 71 hp
- displacement
- 244 ci
- Cylinders
- Not recorded
- Forward gears
- 20
Head to head · Utility
Agco GT65A vs Lindner Geotrac 73
Image not recorded
LindnerModel B
Lindner Geotrac 73
Utility
- power
- 74 hp
- displacement
- 201 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 16
AgcoAgco GT65A
vs
LindnerLindner Geotrac 73
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ Geotrac 73 higher · +3 hp (+4%)GT65A71 hp
Geotrac 7374 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
GT65A is in the 64th percentile; Geotrac 73 is in the 66th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ GT65A higher · +43 ci (+21%)GT65A244 ci
Geotrac 73201 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
GT65A is in the 69th percentile; Geotrac 73 is in the 55th · 5,580 models
Forward Gears
▲ GT65A higher · +4 (+25%)GT65A20
Geotrac 7316
Median Utility Tractor12
GT65A is in the 86th percentile; Geotrac 73 is in the 73rd · 4,941 models
Operating Weight
▲ Geotrac 73 higher · +641 lb (+11%)GT65A5,864 lb
Geotrac 736,505 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
GT65A is in the 55th percentile; Geotrac 73 is in the 62nd · 5,107 models
GT65A (A)Geotrac 73 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Agco GT65A | Lindner Geotrac 73 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Agco | Lindner | — |
| Model | GT65A | Geotrac 73 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Agco GT65A | Lindner Geotrac 73 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Not recorded | Perkins | — |
| Model | Not recorded | 1103 | — |
| Power Output | 71hp | 74hp | ▲ Geotrac 73+3 hp · +4% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,200RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | Not recorded | 3 | — |
| Displacement | 244ci | 201ci | ▲ GT65A+43 ci · +21% |
| Bore | Not recorded | 4.1in | — |
| Stroke | Not recorded | 5in | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Agco GT65A | Lindner Geotrac 73 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Synchro-Shuttle | Manual | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Agco GT65A | Lindner Geotrac 73 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 152in | 149in | ▲ GT65A+3 in · +2% |
| Width | 76.8in | 77.6in | ▲ Geotrac 73+0.8 in · +1% |
| Height | 107in | 96.5in | ▲ GT65A+10.5 in · +11% |
| Operating Weight | 5,864lb | 6,505lb | ▲ Geotrac 73+641 lb · +11% |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Agco GT65A | Lindner Geotrac 73 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Cat II | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | Category 3 | — |
| Hitch Capacity | 3,520lb | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Agco GT65A | Lindner Geotrac 73 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | 4WD | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Agco GT65A | Lindner Geotrac 73 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Cab, ROPS | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 64th percentile (71 hp)B · 66th percentile (74 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 69th percentile (244 ci)B · 55th percentile (201 ci)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 86th percentile (20)B · 73rd percentile (16)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 55th percentile (5,864 lb)B · 62nd percentile (6,505 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 68th percentile (152 in)B · 65th percentile (149 in)
A · GT65AB · Geotrac 73Median Utility Tractor