Image not recorded
AgcoModel A
Agco GT65A
Utility
- power
- 71 hp
- displacement
- 244 ci
- Cylinders
- Not recorded
- Forward gears
- 20
Head to head · Utility
Agco GT65A vs Massey Ferguson 384S
Image not recorded
Massey FergusonModel B
Massey Ferguson 384S
Agricultural
- power
- 72 hp
- displacement
- 236 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 24
AgcoAgco GT65A
vs
Massey FergusonMassey Ferguson 384S
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ 384S higher · +1 hp (+1%)GT65A71 hp
384S72 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
GT65A is in the 64th percentile; 384S is in the 65th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ GT65A higher · +8 ci (+3%)GT65A244 ci
384S236 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
GT65A is in the 69th percentile; 384S is in the 65th · 5,580 models
Forward Gears
▲ 384S higher · +4 (+20%)GT65A20
384S24
Median Utility Tractor12
GT65A is in the 86th percentile; 384S is in the 92nd · 4,941 models
Operating Weight
▲ GT65A higher · +683 lb (+13%)GT65A5,864 lb
384S5,181 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
GT65A is in the 55th percentile; 384S is in the 49th · 5,107 models
GT65A (A)384S (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Agco GT65A | Massey Ferguson 384S | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Agco | Massey Ferguson | — |
| Model | GT65A | 384S | — |
| Category | Utility | Agricultural, Orchard/Vineyard | — |
Engine
| Spec | Agco GT65A | Massey Ferguson 384S | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Not recorded | Perkins | — |
| Model | Not recorded | A4.236 | — |
| Power Output | 71hp | 72hp | ▲ 384S+1 hp · +1% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,200RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | Not recorded | 4 | — |
| Displacement | 244ci | 236ci | ▲ GT65A+8 ci · +3% |
| Bore | Not recorded | 3.9in | — |
| Stroke | Not recorded | 5in | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Agco GT65A | Massey Ferguson 384S | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Synchro-Shuttle | Synchro, Shuttle, Creeper | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Agco GT65A | Massey Ferguson 384S | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 152in | 136in | ▲ GT65A+16 in · +12% |
| Width | 76.8in | 53.5in | ▲ GT65A+23.3 in · +44% |
| Height | 107in | 89in | ▲ GT65A+18 in · +20% |
| Operating Weight | 5,864lb | 5,181lb | ▲ GT65A+683 lb · +13% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Agco GT65A | Massey Ferguson 384S | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Agco GT65A | Massey Ferguson 384S | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Cat II | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | II/I | — |
| Hitch Capacity | 3,520lb | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Agco GT65A | Massey Ferguson 384S | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Agco GT65A | Massey Ferguson 384S | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Voltage | Not recorded | 12V | — |
| Starter Type | Not recorded | Electric | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Agco GT65A | Massey Ferguson 384S | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Cab, ROPS | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 64th percentile (71 hp)B · 65th percentile (72 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 69th percentile (244 ci)B · 65th percentile (236 ci)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 86th percentile (20)B · 92nd percentile (24)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 55th percentile (5,864 lb)B · 49th percentile (5,181 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 68th percentile (152 in)B · 49th percentile (136 in)
A · GT65AB · 384SMedian Utility Tractor