Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
AGCO GT75 vs CaseIH CX80

AGCOAGCO GT75
vs
CaseIHCaseIH CX80
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ CX80 higher · +1 hp (+1%)GT7583 hp
CX8084 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
GT75 is in the 73rd percentile; CX80 is in the 74th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
= Effectively tiedGT75244 ci
CX80244 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
GT75 is in the 68th percentile; CX80 is in the 68th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedGT754
CX804
Median Utility Tractor4
GT75 is in the 50th percentile; CX80 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ GT75 higher · +8 (+100%)GT7516
CX808
Median Utility Tractor12
GT75 is in the 73rd percentile; CX80 is in the 23rd · 4,941 models
GT75 (A)CX80 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | AGCO GT75 | CaseIH CX80 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AGCO | CaseIH | — |
| Model | GT75 | CX80 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | AGCO GT75 | CaseIH CX80 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | SAME Deutz-Fahr | Perkins | — |
| Model | Not recorded | 1004.40T | — |
| Power Output | 83hp | 84hp | ▲ CX80+1 hp · +1% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,200RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 244ci | 244ci | Same |
| Bore | 4.1in | 3.9in | ▲ GT75+0.2 in · +5% |
| Stroke | 4.5in | 5in | ▲ CX80+0.5 in · +11% |
Transmission
| Spec | AGCO GT75 | CaseIH CX80 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Synchro-shuttle | Synchro shuttle | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | AGCO GT75 | CaseIH CX80 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 152in | Not recorded | — |
| Width | 76.4in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 106in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 5,511lb | 8,135lb | ▲ CX80+2,624 lb · +48% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | AGCO GT75 | CaseIH CX80 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Open Center | Same |
| Steering Type | Power | Hydrostatic power | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | AGCO GT75 | CaseIH CX80 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Independent with electro-hydraulic clutch | Independent with hydraulic wet disc clutch | — |
| Speed 1 | 540rpm | 540rpm | Same |
| Speed 2 | 1,000rpm | Not recorded | — |
Tires
| Spec | AGCO GT75 | CaseIH CX80 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | Not recorded | 7.50-16 | — |
| Rear Tire Size | Not recorded | 16.9-30 | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | AGCO GT75 | CaseIH CX80 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | II | II/I | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
| Hitch Capacity | 3,530lb | 3,660lb | ▲ CX80+130 lb · +4% |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | AGCO GT75 | CaseIH CX80 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x2 2WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 2WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Power | Hydrostatic power | — |
| Brake Type | Wet disc | Differential hydraulic wet disc | — |
Electrical
| Spec | AGCO GT75 | CaseIH CX80 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | AGCO GT75 | CaseIH CX80 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 4.2gal | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | AGCO GT75 | CaseIH CX80 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Two-post folding ROPS | Two-post ROPS with flat platform | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 73rd percentile (83 hp)B · 74th percentile (84 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 68th percentile (244 ci)B · 68th percentile (244 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 73rd percentile (16)B · 23rd percentile (8)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 51st percentile (5,511 lb)B · 76th percentile (8,135 lb)
A · GT75B · CX80Median Utility Tractor