Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
AGCO GT75 vs CaseIH MX80C
Image not recorded
CaseIHModel B
CaseIH MX80C
Utility
- power
- 84 hp
- displacement
- 244 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 16
AGCOAGCO GT75
vs
CaseIHCaseIH MX80C
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ MX80C higher · +1 hp (+1%)GT7583 hp
MX80C84 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
GT75 is in the 73rd percentile; MX80C is in the 74th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
= Effectively tiedGT75244 ci
MX80C244 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
GT75 is in the 68th percentile; MX80C is in the 68th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedGT754
MX80C4
Median Utility Tractor4
GT75 is in the 50th percentile; MX80C is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
= Effectively tiedGT7516
MX80C16
Median Utility Tractor12
GT75 is in the 73rd percentile; MX80C is in the 73rd · 4,941 models
GT75 (A)MX80C (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | AGCO GT75 | CaseIH MX80C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AGCO | CaseIH | — |
| Model | GT75 | MX80C | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | AGCO GT75 | CaseIH MX80C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | SAME Deutz-Fahr | Perkins | — |
| Power Output | 83hp | 84hp | ▲ MX80C+1 hp · +1% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,200RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 244ci | 244ci | Same |
| Bore | 4.1in | 3.9in | ▲ GT75+0.2 in · +5% |
| Stroke | 4.5in | 5in | ▲ MX80C+0.5 in · +11% |
Transmission
| Spec | AGCO GT75 | CaseIH MX80C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Synchro-shuttle | 16-speed partial power shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | AGCO GT75 | CaseIH MX80C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 152in | 171in | ▲ MX80C+19 in · +13% |
| Width | 76.4in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 106in | 110in | ▲ MX80C+4 in · +4% |
| Operating Weight | 5,511lb | 10,580lb | ▲ MX80C+5,069 lb · +92% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | AGCO GT75 | CaseIH MX80C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Closed center pressure-flow compensating (PFC) | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Hydrostatic Power | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | AGCO GT75 | CaseIH MX80C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Independent with electro-hydraulic clutch | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 1 | 540rpm | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 2 | 1,000rpm | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | AGCO GT75 | CaseIH MX80C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | II | II | Same |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
| Hitch Capacity | 3,530lb | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | AGCO GT75 | CaseIH MX80C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Hydrostatic Power | — |
| Brake Type | Wet disc | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | AGCO GT75 | CaseIH MX80C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Voltage | Not recorded | 12V | — |
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | AGCO GT75 | CaseIH MX80C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 4.2gal | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | AGCO GT75 | CaseIH MX80C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Two-post folding ROPS | Cab | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 73rd percentile (83 hp)B · 74th percentile (84 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 68th percentile (244 ci)B · 68th percentile (244 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 73rd percentile (16)B · 73rd percentile (16)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 51st percentile (5,511 lb)B · 87th percentile (10,580 lb)
A · GT75B · MX80CMedian Utility Tractor